rs28385710
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_174936.4(PCSK9):c.753C>T(p.Arg251=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00321 in 1,613,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., cov: 35)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 31 hom. )
Consequence
PCSK9
NM_174936.4 synonymous
NM_174936.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.49
Genes affected
PCSK9 (HGNC:20001): (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) This gene encodes a member of the subtilisin-like proprotein convertase family, which includes proteases that process protein and peptide precursors trafficking through regulated or constitutive branches of the secretory pathway. The encoded protein undergoes an autocatalytic processing event with its prosegment in the ER and is constitutively secreted as an inactive protease into the extracellular matrix and trans-Golgi network. It is expressed in liver, intestine and kidney tissues and escorts specific receptors for lysosomal degradation. It plays a role in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 1-55052745-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-55052745-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262907.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-55052745-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-55052745-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.49 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00283 (431/152360) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0226 (109/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0191. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 239 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 35. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 431 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSK9 | NM_174936.4 | c.753C>T | p.Arg251= | synonymous_variant | 5/12 | ENST00000302118.5 | NP_777596.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSK9 | ENST00000302118.5 | c.753C>T | p.Arg251= | synonymous_variant | 5/12 | 1 | NM_174936.4 | ENSP00000303208 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00284 AC: 432AN: 152242Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
432
AN:
152242
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00378 AC: 942AN: 248954Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00465 AC XY: 629AN XY: 135142
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
942
AN:
248954
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
629
AN XY:
135142
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00325 AC: 4747AN: 1460844Hom.: 31 Cov.: 82 AF XY: 0.00368 AC XY: 2671AN XY: 726746
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4747
AN:
1460844
Hom.:
Cov.:
82
AF XY:
AC XY:
2671
AN XY:
726746
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00283 AC: 431AN: 152360Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00321 AC XY: 239AN XY: 74510
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
431
AN:
152360
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
239
AN XY:
74510
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, 3 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 24, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Robarts Research Institute, Western University | Jan 02, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 16, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Hypobetalipoproteinemia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 12, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GENinCode PLC | Sep 07, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at