rs284238
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004565.3(PEX14):c.384+14A>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.142 in 1,599,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18,358 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004565.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.190 AC: 28931AN: 152152Hom.: 3269 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.155 AC: 38508AN: 248840Hom.: 3471 AF XY: 0.157 AC XY: 21089AN XY: 134738
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.137 AC: 198517AN: 1447646Hom.: 15069 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.139 AC XY: 100463AN XY: 721146
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.190 AC: 28992AN: 152270Hom.: 3289 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.196 AC XY: 14596AN XY: 74466
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
- -
- -
Peroxisome biogenesis disorder, complementation group K Benign:1
- -
Peroxisome biogenesis disorder 13A (Zellweger) Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at