rs28615629
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_003172.4(SURF1):āc.280T>Cā(p.Leu94=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0399 in 1,613,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,521 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L94L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003172.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SURF1 | NM_003172.4 | c.280T>C | p.Leu94= | synonymous_variant | 4/9 | ENST00000371974.8 | |
SURF1 | NM_001280787.1 | c.-48T>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 3/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SURF1 | ENST00000371974.8 | c.280T>C | p.Leu94= | synonymous_variant | 4/9 | 1 | NM_003172.4 | P1 | |
SURF1 | ENST00000615505.4 | c.-48T>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 3/8 | 1 | ||||
SURF1 | ENST00000437995.1 | n.226T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/8 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0477 AC: 7255AN: 152016Hom.: 194 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0369 AC: 9278AN: 251274Hom.: 230 AF XY: 0.0369 AC XY: 5007AN XY: 135830
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0391 AC: 57080AN: 1461224Hom.: 1327 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0385 AC XY: 27974AN XY: 726930
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0477 AC: 7260AN: 152134Hom.: 194 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0484 AC XY: 3598AN XY: 74358
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 06, 2011 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 18, 2017 | Variant summary: The SURF1 c.280T>C (p.Leu94Leu) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing and ESE sites at the locus are not predicted to be affected. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 10613/277080 control chromosomes (258 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.038303, which is approximately 22 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SURF1 variant (0.0017678), strongly suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as likely benign or benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Leigh syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 25, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at