rs28730852

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):c.3193T>C(p.Ser1065Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00098 in 1,614,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0053 ( 7 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00053 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.26

Variant links:

Genes affected

ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

ALMS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.003911495).

BP6

Variant 2-73449720-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73449720-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 387347.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00534 (812/152202) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.018 (746/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0169. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 392 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ALMS1	NM_001378454.1 link	c.3193T>C	p.Ser1065Pro	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 23	ENST00000613296.6	NP_001365383.1
ALMS1	NM_015120.4 link	c.3193T>C	p.Ser1065Pro	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 23		NP_055935.4	Q8TCU4

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ALMS1	ENST00000613296.6 link	c.3193T>C	p.Ser1065Pro	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 23	1	NM_001378454.1	ENSP00000482968.1		Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00534

AC:

812

AN:

152084

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0180

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00383

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00118

AC:

293

AN:

249056

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000977

AC XY:

132

AN XY:

135088

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0158

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000354

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000991

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000527

AC:

770

AN:

1461814

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000459

AC XY:

334

AN XY:

727216

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0178

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00121

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00146

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00534

AC:

812

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00527

AC XY:

392

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0180

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00347

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00379

Alfa

AF:

0.000968

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00606

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0144

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00149

AC:

180

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000546

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Mar 21, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ser1064Pro in exon 8 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.58% (155/9794) of African chromo somes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs28730852). -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Sep 14, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Alstrom syndrome

Benign:4

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs28730852 in Alstrom syndrome yet. -

Sep 14, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Monogenic diabetes

Benign:1

May 18, 2018

Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

ACMG criteria: BP4 (9 predictors, Revel score 0.018), BS2 (35 cases and 38 controls in type2diabetesgenetics.org, 3 homozygotes in gnomAD), BP1, BS1 (MAF 1.7% in gnomAD Africans)= benign -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jan 26, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.054

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.66

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.71

CADD

Benign

0.011

DANN

Benign

0.10

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.0059

T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.8

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.8

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0012

LIST_S2

Benign

0.27

T;T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0039

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.97

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

Sift4G

Benign

0.37

T;T;T

Vest4

0.064

MVP

0.085

ClinPred

0.0044

GERP RS

-4.6

Varity_R

0.056

gMVP

0.038

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over