rs28730859
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 2P and 17B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):c.11223G>A(p.Glu3741=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000844 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 synonymous
NM_001378454.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.387
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 2-73573100-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73573100-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 391518.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.387 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000598 (91/152238) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00097 (66/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000782. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 43 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | NM_001378454.1 | c.11223G>A | p.Glu3741= | synonymous_variant | 16/23 | ENST00000613296.6 | |
ALMS1 | NM_015120.4 | c.11226G>A | p.Glu3742= | synonymous_variant | 16/23 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | ENST00000613296.6 | c.11223G>A | p.Glu3741= | synonymous_variant | 16/23 | 1 | NM_001378454.1 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000598 AC: 91AN: 152120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
91
AN:
152120
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000628 AC: 156AN: 248288Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000593 AC XY: 80AN XY: 134794
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
156
AN:
248288
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
134794
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000869 AC: 1271AN: 1461804Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000877 AC XY: 638AN XY: 727190
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1271
AN:
1461804
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
638
AN XY:
727190
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000598 AC: 91AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000578 AC XY: 43AN XY: 74434
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
91
AN:
152238
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
74434
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2023 | ALMS1: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 04, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Alstrom syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 15, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 10, 2023 | Variant summary: ALMS1 c.11220G>A alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00063 in 248288 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Cardiomyopathy (0.00063 vs 0.0022), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.11220G>A in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. No submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 08, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at