rs28756986

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001040108.2(MLH3):​c.1870G>C​(p.Glu624Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00964 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 95 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0075 ( 6 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0099 ( 89 hom. )

Consequence

MLH3
NM_001040108.2 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.23
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH3 (HGNC:7128): (mutL homolog 3) This gene is a member of the MutL-homolog (MLH) family of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MLH genes are implicated in maintaining genomic integrity during DNA replication and after meiotic recombination. The protein encoded by this gene functions as a heterodimer with other family members. Somatic mutations in this gene frequently occur in tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability, and germline mutations have been linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer type 7 (HNPCC7). Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified, but the full-length nature of only two transcript variants has been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0042276084).
BP6
Variant 14-75047786-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-75047786-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 5560.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-75047786-C-G is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr14-75047786-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00745 (1135/152320) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0121 (823/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0114. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 528 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1135 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MLH3NM_001040108.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1870G>C p.Glu624Gln missense_variant 2/13 ENST00000355774.7 NP_001035197.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MLH3ENST00000355774.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1870G>C p.Glu624Gln missense_variant 2/135 NM_001040108.2 ENSP00000348020 P1Q9UHC1-1
MLH3ENST00000380968.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1870G>C p.Glu624Gln missense_variant 2/121 ENSP00000370355 Q9UHC1-2
MLH3ENST00000556257.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1870G>C p.Glu624Gln missense_variant 2/75 ENSP00000451540

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00745
AC:
1134
AN:
152202
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00772
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00641
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00719
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00716
AC:
1799
AN:
251246
Hom.:
8
AF XY:
0.00712
AC XY:
967
AN XY:
135764
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00582
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00377
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00804
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00636
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00987
AC:
14420
AN:
1461698
Hom.:
89
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00959
AC XY:
6976
AN XY:
727156
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00575
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00167
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00953
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00894
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00745
AC:
1135
AN:
152320
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00709
AC XY:
528
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00221
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00771
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00641
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00712
Alfa
AF:
0.0109
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.00689
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0146
AC:
54
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0148
AC:
57
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00295
AC:
13
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0121
AC:
104
ExAC
AF:
0.00728
AC:
884
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0100
EpiControl
AF:
0.00931

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 7 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMApr 01, 2009- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 01, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 28, 2024- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MLH3 p.Glu624Gln variant was identified in 7 of 1036 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00676) from individuals or families with suspected Lynch syndrome or colorectal cancer (Wu_2001_PMID: 11586295, Liu_2003_PMID: 12702580, Rohlin_2017_PMID: 27696107, & Hienonen_2003_PMID: 12800209). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs28756986) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae with the associated phenotype of Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer type 7/MLH3-Related Lynch Syndrome; and uncertain significance by OMIM), and LOVD 3.0 (multiple entries with classifications of VUS, likely benign, and pathogenic). The variant was not identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in control databases in 2120 of 282638 chromosomes (11 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.007501 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 1516 of 129054 chromosomes (freq: 0.01175), European (Finnish) in 201 of 25108 chromosomes (freq: 0.008005), Other in 49 of 7218 chromosomes (freq: 0.006789), Latino in 210 of 35396 chromosomes (freq: 0.005933), Ashkenazi Jewish in 39 of 10362 chromosomes (freq: 0.003764), African in 51 of 24968 chromosomes (freq: 0.002043), South Asian in 53 of 30584 chromosomes (freq: 0.001733) and East Asian in 1 of 19948 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005). To clarify the role of the p.E624Q, in vitro functional studies were conducted transfecting wildtype and mutant MLH3 into HEK293T cells which showed no difference in protein expression, stability, localization or interaction with wildtype MLH1 (Ou_2009_PMID: 19156873). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Glu624 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, however four out of five computational analyses (SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, and MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 28, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 01, 2020This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.16
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.37
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.32
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.62
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0042
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;M;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
N;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.043
D;.;T;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.10
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;D;.;D
Vest4
0.11
MVP
0.64
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.014
T
GERP RS
3.9
Varity_R
0.17
gMVP
0.38

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28756986; hg19: chr14-75514489; COSMIC: COSV53156471; COSMIC: COSV53156471; API