Menu
GeneBe

rs28897710

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.1792A>G​(p.Thr598Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00184 in 1,607,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T598I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:34O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.00600
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0041814446).
BP6
Variant 13-32333270-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32333270-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41543.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32333270-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32333270-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1792A>G p.Thr598Ala missense_variant 10/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1792A>G p.Thr598Ala missense_variant 10/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00171
AC:
260
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00782
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00221
AC:
540
AN:
244286
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00215
AC XY:
285
AN XY:
132304
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000691
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00205
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00818
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00186
AC:
2706
AN:
1455294
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00182
AC XY:
1315
AN XY:
723806
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000182
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000599
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000166
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00741
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00178
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00171
AC:
260
AN:
152320
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00204
AC XY:
152
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000409
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00782
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00207
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00117
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00337
AC:
13
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00175
AC:
15
ExAC
AF:
0.00227
AC:
276
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:34Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:11Other:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 18, 2019IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000045 -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylFeb 19, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
not provided, no classification providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingJohns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins UniversityOct 02, 2020- -
not specified Benign:8Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.8% (53/6604) Finnish chromosomes -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 05, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 16, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 15, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 22, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2024BRCA2: BP1, BP4, BS3:Supporting, BS1 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicDec 18, 2017- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsApr 27, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 15, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 10, 2020- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 01, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 22, 2014The variant is found in BRCA1-BRCA2,PANC-HEREDIC,BR-OV-HEREDIC,HIRISK-BR-HEREDIC,ENDOM-HEREDIC panel(s). -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 21, 2016- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.080
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
5.9
DANN
Benign
0.68
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.031
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.042
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0042
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.12
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.80
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.48
T;T
Vest4
0.084
MVP
0.63
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.00045
T
GERP RS
-2.8
gMVP
0.058

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897710; hg19: chr13-32907407; COSMIC: COSV104430656; API