Menu
GeneBe

rs28897720

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.3539A>G(p.Lys1180Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000601 in 1,613,996 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K1180E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000061 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.317
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.23354298).
BP6
Variant 13-32337894-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32337894-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51484.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=7}. Variant chr13-32337894-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3539A>G p.Lys1180Arg missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3539A>G p.Lys1180Arg missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000239
AC:
6
AN:
250926
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135612
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000353
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000609
AC:
89
AN:
1461772
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000495
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000746
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.0000579
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000378
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Aug 19, 2011- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 10, 2016- -
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 17, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 09, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Published functional studies suggest no damaging effect: classified as functionally normal in an assay measuring cell survival (Billaud et al., 2021); Observed in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast, prostate, or pancreatic cancer, as well as unaffected controls from a breast cancer study (Klemp et al., 2000; Lu et al., 2015; Abe et al., 2019; Dorling et al., 2021); Also known as 3767A>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 30883245, 10882858, 27633797, 31911673, 32377563, 31131967, 29884841, 26689913, 33471991, 34749799) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 14, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJul 27, 2016- -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 23, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 11, 2023Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3539A>G (p.Lys1180Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 250926 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.3539A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (Klemp_2000) and one unaffected individual with a family history of pancreatic cancer (Abe_2019). A recent case-control study showed that this variant was not associated with breast cancer (Dorling_2021). At least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the BRCA share database (BRCA2 c.8070_8071dup, p.Ser2691PhefsX4), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function: haploid cells vulnerable to DNA damage induced death/arrest were genetically modified to express either the variant or control protein and survival/proliferation was measured by relative sequence frequency (Billaud_2021). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 10882858, 30883245, 33471991, 34749799). Ten ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: six classified the variant as of uncertain significance, three as likely benign, and one as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 12, 2024This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 1180 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Lys1180Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs28897720, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 30883245). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 51484). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.079
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
Cadd
Benign
7.0
Dann
Benign
0.96
Eigen
Benign
-0.86
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.90
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.11
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.027
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.23
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.0
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.57
T;T
Vest4
0.50
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.023
ClinPred
0.18
T
GERP RS
-1.0
gMVP
0.17

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897720; hg19: chr13-32912031; COSMIC: COSV66448070; COSMIC: COSV66448070; API