rs28897721
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.3581G>A(p.Gly1194Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000114 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.3581G>A | p.Gly1194Asp | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.3581G>A | p.Gly1194Asp | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000837 AC: 21AN: 251042Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000133 AC XY: 18AN XY: 135726
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000121 AC: 177AN: 1461770Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000131 AC XY: 95AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152254Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:4
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000646 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 20, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | May 02, 2008 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 20, 2019 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Gly1194Asp variant has been identified in 1 out of 132 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.008) in individuals with breast cancer phenotype; however no normal population controls were included in this study (Musolino 2007). It is also listed in dbSNP database presented “with untested allele” (ID#: rs28897721) while no frequency information is provided, therefore representing a rare allele. The variant is also listed in the BIC database 7x as a variant of unknown clinical significance and 4x in the UMD database as a likely neutral variant and was observed once in conjunction with a second "unclassified variant". The p.Gly1194 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In addition in silico risk assessment analysis of this variant do not suggest clinical significance (Easton 2007, Lindor 2011). Our laboratory has previously identified this variant in one individual who also had a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 increasing the likelihood this variant is benign. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time, although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as Benign. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 09, 2020 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3581G>A (p.Gly1194Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2 repeat region of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.7e-05 in 252186 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (8.7e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.3581G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and Ovarian Cancer (e.g. Alsop 2012, Musolino 2007), without strong evidence for pathogenicity. The variant was predicted to be neutral with a multifactorial probability model, based on tumor pathology, clinical histories, family studies and co-occurrence with deleterious mutations (Easton 2007). In addition, UMD BRCA2 database classified this variant as 'likely neutral'. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been observed (BRCA2 c.5130_5133delTGTA, p.Y1710* at our laboratory; TP53 c.524G>A , p.R175H in a family with Li-Fraunemi syndrome, Zampiga_2016), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Nine clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (benign, n=3, likely benign, n=5, VUS, n=1). Based on the lack of any actionable evidence supporting a pathogenic outcome as outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2023 | BRCA2: BP2, BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 27, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25980754, 24323938, 22703879, 21990134, 17924331, 26689913, 17257844, 27150160, 26155992) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 26, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 08, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 28, 2021 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 07, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | - | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Mar 14, 2024 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 20, 2019 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 11, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at