rs28897721

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.3581G>A​(p.Gly1194Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000114 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.377
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.078899235).
BP6
Variant 13-32337936-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32337936-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41548.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32337936-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3581G>A p.Gly1194Asp missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3581G>A p.Gly1194Asp missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000837
AC:
21
AN:
251042
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000133
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135726
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000121
AC:
177
AN:
1461770
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000131
AC XY:
95
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000928
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000147
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152254
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000672
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000396
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000227
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.0000988
AC:
12
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:17
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:4
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000646 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylNov 20, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 02, 2008- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 20, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Gly1194Asp variant has been identified in 1 out of 132 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.008) in individuals with breast cancer phenotype; however no normal population controls were included in this study (Musolino 2007). It is also listed in dbSNP database presented “with untested allele” (ID#: rs28897721) while no frequency information is provided, therefore representing a rare allele. The variant is also listed in the BIC database 7x as a variant of unknown clinical significance and 4x in the UMD database as a likely neutral variant and was observed once in conjunction with a second "unclassified variant". The p.Gly1194 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In addition in silico risk assessment analysis of this variant do not suggest clinical significance (Easton 2007, Lindor 2011). Our laboratory has previously identified this variant in one individual who also had a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 increasing the likelihood this variant is benign. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time, although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as Benign. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 09, 2020Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3581G>A (p.Gly1194Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2 repeat region of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.7e-05 in 252186 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (8.7e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.3581G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and Ovarian Cancer (e.g. Alsop 2012, Musolino 2007), without strong evidence for pathogenicity. The variant was predicted to be neutral with a multifactorial probability model, based on tumor pathology, clinical histories, family studies and co-occurrence with deleterious mutations (Easton 2007). In addition, UMD BRCA2 database classified this variant as 'likely neutral'. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been observed (BRCA2 c.5130_5133delTGTA, p.Y1710* at our laboratory; TP53 c.524G>A , p.R175H in a family with Li-Fraunemi syndrome, Zampiga_2016), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Nine clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (benign, n=3, likely benign, n=5, VUS, n=1). Based on the lack of any actionable evidence supporting a pathogenic outcome as outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023BRCA2: BP2, BP4 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 27, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25980754, 24323938, 22703879, 21990134, 17924331, 26689913, 17257844, 27150160, 26155992) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 26, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 08, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 28, 2021- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 07, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 17, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Mar 14, 2024- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 20, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 11, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.098
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
0.57
DANN
Benign
0.16
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.061
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.075
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.079
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.48
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.33
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T;T
Vest4
0.28
MutPred
0.34
Gain of helix (P = 0.0325);Gain of helix (P = 0.0325);
MVP
0.64
MPC
0.037
ClinPred
0.0077
T
GERP RS
-2.2
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897721; hg19: chr13-32912073; API