rs28897762

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.10110G>A​(p.Arg3370Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00173 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:31

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.137
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 13-32398623-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398623-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 51043.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32398623-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32398623-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.137 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.10110G>A p.Arg3370Arg synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.10110G>A p.Arg3370Arg synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.9741G>A p.Arg3247Arg synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*2168G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 26 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.*2168G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 26 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00127
AC:
193
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00204
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00140
AC:
352
AN:
251248
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00147
AC XY:
199
AN XY:
135788
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00182
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00178
AC:
2595
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00181
AC XY:
1319
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00186
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00180
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00127
AC:
193
AN:
152270
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00122
AC XY:
91
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00204
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00150
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00107
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00202
EpiControl
AF:
0.00142

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:31
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
May 25, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2017
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 15, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA2, c.10110G>A, p.Arg3370Arg, Predicted Benign. This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, is listed in dbSNP (rs28897762) from a clinical source with an average heterozygosity and standard error of 0.004+/-0.047, and was also detected, with similar frequencies, in various ethnic mutation screening studies without any information to assess the significance of this variant (Bergthorsson_2001_11389159, Campos_2001_11843247, Diez_2003_12955716, Edwards_2003_12474142, Claes_2004_15026808, Infante_2006_16758124, Borg_2010_20104584, Stegel_2011_21232165). In addition, this variant is listed in the UMD mutation database to co-occur with a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 (c.5330T>A/p.Tyr1769X), increasing the likelihood that p.Arg3370Arg is benign. Further, Myriad calls this a polymorphism (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, the p.Arg3370Arg variant is predicted to be benign. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:7
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 12, 2000
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 29, 2017
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method: curation

Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/) and frequency 0.002 (Non-Finnish European), 0.0018 (Finnish), 0.0014 (South Asian), derived from ExAC (2014-12-17). -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2014
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 10, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2021
Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Nov 16, 2021
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 27, 2014
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Oct 16, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Jun 27, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 13, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 10, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
May 15, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 11, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4, BP7 -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Apr 14, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
May 22, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Feb 23, 2017
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
0.84
DANN
Benign
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897762; hg19: chr13-32972760; COSMIC: COSV104700964; COSMIC: COSV104700964; API