rs28897765
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001184.4(ATR):āc.1326A>Gā(p.Lys442=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0197 in 1,613,898 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 400 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.018 ( 30 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.020 ( 370 hom. )
Consequence
ATR
NM_001184.4 synonymous
NM_001184.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.327
Genes affected
ATR (HGNC:882): (ATR serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase and DNA damage sensor, activating cell cycle checkpoint signaling upon DNA stress. The encoded protein can phosphorylate and activate several proteins involved in the inhibition of DNA replication and mitosis, and can promote DNA repair, recombination, and apoptosis. This protein is also important for fragile site stability and centrosome duplication. Defects in this gene are a cause of Seckel syndrome 1. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 3-142561266-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-142561266-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 157962.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-142561266-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.327 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.018 (2744/152228) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0411 (198/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0364. There are 30 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1289 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 30 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATR | NM_001184.4 | c.1326A>G | p.Lys442= | synonymous_variant | 5/47 | ENST00000350721.9 | NP_001175.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATR | ENST00000350721.9 | c.1326A>G | p.Lys442= | synonymous_variant | 5/47 | 1 | NM_001184.4 | ENSP00000343741 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0180 AC: 2743AN: 152110Hom.: 30 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2743
AN:
152110
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0182 AC: 4584AN: 251452Hom.: 84 AF XY: 0.0197 AC XY: 2671AN XY: 135902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4584
AN:
251452
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2671
AN XY:
135902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0198 AC: 28998AN: 1461670Hom.: 370 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0204 AC XY: 14851AN XY: 727144
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
28998
AN:
1461670
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
14851
AN XY:
727144
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0180 AC: 2744AN: 152228Hom.: 30 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0173 AC XY: 1289AN XY: 74444
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2744
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1289
AN XY:
74444
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
95
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 02, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 27, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.1326A>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous mutation. Mutation taster predicts benign outcome for this variant along with 4/5 in silico tools via Alamut predicting the variant not to have an impact on normal splicing. This variant is found in 2299/121410 control chromosomes (48 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0189358, which is about 30297 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0000006), suggesting this variant is benign. In addition, a clinical laboratory classifies this variant as benign (without evidence to independently evaluate). Taken together, this variant was classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Familial cutaneous telangiectasia and oropharyngeal predisposition cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Feb 08, 2023 | - - |
Seckel syndrome 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Feb 08, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at