rs28929479
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_ModeratePP5
The ENST00000342694.7(NPR2):c.528T>A(p.Asp176Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
NPR2
ENST00000342694.7 missense
ENST00000342694.7 missense
Scores
4
7
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0890
Genes affected
NPR2 (HGNC:7944): (natriuretic peptide receptor 2) This gene encodes natriuretic peptide receptor B, one of two integral membrane receptors for natriuretic peptides. Both NPR1 and NPR2 contain five functional domains: an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a single membrane-spanning region, and intracellularly a protein kinase homology domain, a helical hinge region involved in oligomerization, and a carboxyl-terminal guanylyl cyclase catalytic domain. The protein is the primary receptor for C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), which upon ligand binding exhibits greatly increased guanylyl cyclase activity. Mutations in this gene are the cause of acromesomelic dysplasia Maroteaux type. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), NPR2. . Gene score misZ 2.9586 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.5861 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with short stature with nonspecific skeletal abnormalities, acromesomelic dysplasia 1, Maroteaux type, tall stature-scoliosis-macrodactyly of the great toes syndrome.
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.883
PP5
Variant 9-35792936-T-A is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr9-35792936-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 17786.Status of the report is no_assertion_criteria_provided, 0 stars. Variant chr9-35792936-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPR2 | NM_003995.4 | c.528T>A | p.Asp176Glu | missense_variant | 1/22 | ENST00000342694.7 | NP_003986.2 | |
NPR2 | NM_001378923.1 | c.528T>A | p.Asp176Glu | missense_variant | 1/22 | NP_001365852.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPR2 | ENST00000342694.7 | c.528T>A | p.Asp176Glu | missense_variant | 1/22 | 1 | NM_003995.4 | ENSP00000341083 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Pathogenic
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Acromesomelic dysplasia 1, Maroteaux type Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jul 01, 2004 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M
MutationTaster
Benign
A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of helix (P = 0.062);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at