rs28935495
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000169.3(GLA):c.815A>G(p.Asn272Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N272K) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000169.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLA | NM_000169.3 | c.815A>G | p.Asn272Ser | missense_variant | 6/7 | ENST00000218516.4 | NP_000160.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLA | ENST00000218516.4 | c.815A>G | p.Asn272Ser | missense_variant | 6/7 | 1 | NM_000169.3 | ENSP00000218516.4 | ||
RPL36A-HNRNPH2 | ENST00000409170.3 | c.300+3097T>C | intron_variant | 4 | ENSP00000386655.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 23
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 23
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Fabry disease Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Jul 01, 2019 | This variant was classified as: Pathogenic. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PS1,PM1,PM2,PP2,PP3. - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Aug 01, 2004 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at