rs28936695
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_000223.4(KRT12):c.386T>C(p.Met129Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M129V) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000223.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- corneal dystrophy, Meesmann, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Meesmann corneal dystrophyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000223.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRT12 | NM_000223.4 | MANE Select | c.386T>C | p.Met129Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 8 | NP_000214.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRT12 | ENST00000251643.5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.386T>C | p.Met129Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 8 | ENSP00000251643.4 | ||
| KRT12 | ENST00000647902.1 | c.278T>C | p.Met93Thr | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000497770.1 | |||
| ENSG00000265359 | ENST00000818906.1 | n.62-10917A>G | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
ClinVar submissions as Germline
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at