rs28937875
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_170784.3(MKKS):c.155G>T(p.Gly52Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G52D) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_170784.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- McKusick-Kaufman syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- Bardet-Biedl syndrome 6Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Bardet-Biedl syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKKS | NM_170784.3 | c.155G>T | p.Gly52Val | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | ENST00000347364.7 | NP_740754.1 | |
| MKKS | NM_018848.3 | c.155G>T | p.Gly52Val | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | NP_061336.1 | ||
| MKKS | NR_072977.2 | n.347-4557G>T | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 4 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKKS | ENST00000347364.7 | c.155G>T | p.Gly52Val | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | 1 | NM_170784.3 | ENSP00000246062.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at