rs28997577

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004656.4(BAP1):​c.1002A>G​(p.Leu334Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00567 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0039 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0059 ( 66 hom. )

Consequence

BAP1
NM_004656.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.128

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BAP1 (HGNC:950): (BRCA1 associated protein 1) This gene belongs to the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase subfamily of deubiquitinating enzymes that are involved in the removal of ubiquitin from proteins. The encoded enzyme binds to the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) via the RING finger domain of the latter and acts as a tumor suppressor. In addition, the enzyme may be involved in regulation of transcription, regulation of cell cycle and growth, response to DNA damage and chromatin dynamics. Germline mutations in this gene may be associated with tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS), which involves increased risk of cancers including malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
BAP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Kury-Isidor syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • renal cell carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 3-52405224-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-52405224-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 220641.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.128 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00386 (588/152274) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0234 (113/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0199. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 299 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 588 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BAP1NM_004656.4 linkc.1002A>G p.Leu334Leu synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 17 ENST00000460680.6 NP_004647.1 Q92560A0A024R305

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BAP1ENST00000460680.6 linkc.1002A>G p.Leu334Leu synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 17 1 NM_004656.4 ENSP00000417132.1 Q92560
BAP1ENST00000296288.9 linkc.948A>G p.Leu316Leu synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 17 5 ENSP00000296288.5 F8W6N3
BAP1ENST00000490804.1 linkn.430A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 3 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00387
AC:
589
AN:
152156
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000869
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00771
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00475
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00594
AC:
1494
AN:
251430
AF XY:
0.00697
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000923
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00783
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00417
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00293
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00586
AC:
8566
AN:
1461782
Hom.:
66
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00638
AC XY:
4638
AN XY:
727184
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000627
AC:
21
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00224
AC:
100
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00161
AC:
42
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00796
AC:
316
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0233
AC:
2008
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00152
AC:
81
AN:
53320
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00520
AC:
30
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00506
AC:
5630
AN:
1112002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00560
AC:
338
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
529
1058
1586
2115
2644
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
236
472
708
944
1180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00386
AC:
588
AN:
152274
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00402
AC XY:
299
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000866
AC:
36
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00314
AC:
48
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00773
AC:
40
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0234
AC:
113
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00141
AC:
15
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00473
AC:
322
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00284
AC:
6
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.514
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
28
56
85
113
141
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00369
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00306
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00982
AC:
34
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00403
EpiControl
AF:
0.00498

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Jan 27, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 13, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 02, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome Benign:5
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Oct 21, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Aug 25, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
May 05, 2024
Hereditary Cancer Laboratory, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BP4+BP6 -

Mar 09, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 30, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Melanoma, uveal, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.75
PhyloP100
0.13
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28997577; hg19: chr3-52439240; COSMIC: COSV56231289; COSMIC: COSV56231289; API