rs28997577

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004656.4(BAP1):c.1002A>G(p.Leu334Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00567 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0039 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0059 ( 66 hom. )

Consequence

BAP1
NM_004656.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.128

Variant links:

Genes affected

BAP1 (HGNC:950): (BRCA1 associated protein 1) This gene belongs to the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase subfamily of deubiquitinating enzymes that are involved in the removal of ubiquitin from proteins. The encoded enzyme binds to the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) via the RING finger domain of the latter and acts as a tumor suppressor. In addition, the enzyme may be involved in regulation of transcription, regulation of cell cycle and growth, response to DNA damage and chromatin dynamics. Germline mutations in this gene may be associated with tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS), which involves increased risk of cancers including malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

BAP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).

BP6

Variant 3-52405224-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-52405224-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 220641.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-52405224-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr3-52405224-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.128 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00386 (588/152274) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0234 (113/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0199. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 299 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 588 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BAP1	NM_004656.4 link	c.1002A>G	p.Leu334Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	ENST00000460680.6	NP_004647.1	Q92560A0A024R305

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BAP1	ENST00000460680.6 link	c.1002A>G	p.Leu334Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	1	NM_004656.4	ENSP00000417132.1	Q92560
BAP1	ENST00000296288.9 link	c.948A>G	p.Leu316Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	5		ENSP00000296288.5	F8W6N3
BAP1	ENST00000490804.1 link	n.430A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 3	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00387

AC:

589

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000869

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00314

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00771

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0236

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00475

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00594

AC:

1494

AN:

251430

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00697

AC XY:

947

AN XY:

135890

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000923

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00783

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0232

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00417

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00293

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00586

AC:

8566

AN:

1461782

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00638

AC XY:

4638

AN XY:

727184

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000627

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00161

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00796

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0233

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00152

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00506

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00560

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00386

AC:

588

AN:

152274

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00402

AC XY:

299

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000866

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00314

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00773

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0234

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00141

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00473

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00284

Alfa

AF:

0.00341

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00306

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00982

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00403

EpiControl

AF:

0.00498

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7

Jun 02, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 13, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 27, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome

Benign:4

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Aug 25, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

May 30, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 09, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Melanoma, uveal, susceptibility to, 2

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over