rs2985685

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_018139.3(DNAAF2):​c.498C>T​(p.Ala166Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.713 in 1,606,680 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 422,825 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.65 ( 34105 hom., cov: 35)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.72 ( 388720 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF2
NM_018139.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.913

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAAF2 (HGNC:20188): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 2) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein involved in the preassembly of dynein arm complexes which power cilia. These complexes are found in some cilia and are assembled in the cytoplasm prior to transport for cilia formation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DNAAF2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 10
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, ClinGen
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 14-49634652-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-49634652-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95894.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.913 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.755 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAAF2NM_018139.3 linkc.498C>T p.Ala166Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 3 ENST00000298292.13 NP_060609.2 Q9NVR5-1
DNAAF2NM_001083908.2 linkc.498C>T p.Ala166Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 2 NP_001077377.1 Q9NVR5-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAAF2ENST00000298292.13 linkc.498C>T p.Ala166Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 3 1 NM_018139.3 ENSP00000298292.8 Q9NVR5-1
DNAAF2ENST00000406043.3 linkc.498C>T p.Ala166Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 2 1 ENSP00000384862.3 Q9NVR5-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.651
AC:
98942
AN:
152076
Hom.:
34092
Cov.:
35
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.495
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.827
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.661
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.712
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.148
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.533
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.795
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.690
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.761
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.673
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.646
AC:
153188
AN:
237064
AF XY:
0.650
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.489
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.603
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.717
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.778
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.762
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.690
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.720
AC:
1047179
AN:
1454488
Hom.:
388720
Cov.:
92
AF XY:
0.716
AC XY:
518273
AN XY:
723902
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.485
AC:
16225
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.612
AC:
27363
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.720
AC:
18808
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.122
AC:
4827
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.547
AC:
47187
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.774
AC:
36001
AN:
46496
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.652
AC:
3760
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.766
AC:
852040
AN:
1111682
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.679
AC:
40968
AN:
60308
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20461
40922
61382
81843
102304
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20150
40300
60450
80600
100750
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.651
AC:
99006
AN:
152192
Hom.:
34105
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.648
AC XY:
48225
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.495
AC:
20562
AN:
41524
American (AMR)
AF:
0.661
AC:
10112
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.712
AC:
2472
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.148
AC:
765
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.532
AC:
2569
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.795
AC:
8444
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.701
AC:
206
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.761
AC:
51701
AN:
67966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.673
AC:
1422
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1676
3352
5029
6705
8381
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
770
1540
2310
3080
3850
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.725
Hom.:
12498
Bravo
AF:
0.633
Asia WGS
AF:
0.393
AC:
1367
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.755
EpiControl
AF:
0.765

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala166Ala in exon 1 of DNAAF2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 47.4% (1842/3888) o f African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2985685). -

Mar 06, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 10 Benign:3
Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Nov 26, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Sep 13, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
7.7
DANN
Benign
0.91
PhyloP100
0.91
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2985685; hg19: chr14-50101370; COSMIC: COSV53568316; COSMIC: COSV53568316; API