rs3026268

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002485.5(NBN):​c.1489A>G​(p.Thr497Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,613,508 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0067 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00069 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

NBN
NM_002485.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.694
Variant links:
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002968192).
BP6
Variant 8-89953600-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89953600-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 134872.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-89953600-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00665 (1013/152270) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0231 (959/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0219. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 492 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NBNNM_002485.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1489A>G p.Thr497Ala missense_variant 11/16 ENST00000265433.8 NP_002476.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NBNENST00000265433.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1489A>G p.Thr497Ala missense_variant 11/161 NM_002485.5 ENSP00000265433 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00666
AC:
1013
AN:
152152
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00223
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00527
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00181
AC:
454
AN:
250896
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00120
AC XY:
163
AN XY:
135610
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000618
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000688
AC:
1006
AN:
1461238
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000583
AC XY:
424
AN XY:
726924
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0244
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00142
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00665
AC:
1013
AN:
152270
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00661
AC XY:
492
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00521
Alfa
AF:
0.00122
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00802
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0241
AC:
106
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00217
AC:
263
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000867
AC:
3
AN:
3474
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 03, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 25, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 19, 2018- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 04, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsAug 17, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 28, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Nov 09, 2021- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 19, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2023NBN: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Aplastic anemia;C0023449:Acute lymphoid leukemia;C0398791:Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 19, 2022- -
Acute lymphoid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The NBN p.Thr497Ala variant was identified in 6 of 2520 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from American individuals or families with a history of Lynch syndrome associated cancers and/or polyps (Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs3026268) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Prevention Genetics, ARUP Laboratories and likely benign by Genetic Services Laboratory (University of Chicago) and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1X) and in control databases in 622 (10 homozygous) of 276618 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 569 (10 homozygous) of 24014 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Other in 4 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), Latino in 39 of 34386 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European Non-Finnish in 7 of 126274 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), and South Asian in 3 of 30770 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and European Finnish populations.. The variant was not identified in Clinvitae, Cosmic, and LOVD 3.0 databases. The p.Thr497 residue is conserved in in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.63
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
3.6
DANN
Benign
0.65
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.026
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.46
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0030
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.93
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.080
Sift
Benign
0.30
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.34
T;T
Polyphen
0.0070
B;.
Vest4
0.038
MVP
0.41
MPC
0.067
ClinPred
0.0062
T
GERP RS
-11
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.023
gMVP
0.17

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3026268; hg19: chr8-90965828; COSMIC: COSV104545497; COSMIC: COSV104545497; API