rs3027580
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_019597.5(HNRNPH2):c.-54+353C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0688 in 111,268 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 205 homozygotes. There are 2,427 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.069 ( 205 hom., 2427 hem., cov: 22)
Consequence
HNRNPH2
NM_019597.5 intron
NM_019597.5 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.432
Publications
2 publications found
Genes affected
HNRNPH2 (HGNC:5042): (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H2) This gene belongs to the subfamily of ubiquitously expressed heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs). The hnRNPs are RNA binding proteins and they complex with heterogeneous nuclear RNA (hnRNA). These proteins are associated with pre-mRNAs in the nucleus and appear to influence pre-mRNA processing and other aspects of mRNA metabolism and transport. While all of the hnRNPs are present in the nucleus some seem to shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The hnRNP proteins have distinct nucleic acid binding properties. The protein encoded by this gene has three repeats of quasi-RRM domains that binds to RNAs. It is very similar to the family member HNRPH1. This gene is thought to be involved in Fabray disease and X-linked agammaglobulinemia phenotype. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding the same protein. Read-through transcription between this locus and the ribosomal protein L36a gene has been observed. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
RPL36A-HNRNPH2 (HGNC:48349): (RPL36A-HNRNPH2 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring ribosomal protein L36a and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H2 (H') genes on chromosome X. The read-through transcript produces a protein with similarity to the protein encoded by the upstream locus, ribosomal protein L36a. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant X-101408672-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-101408672-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 1167953.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.259 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNRNPH2 | NM_019597.5 | c.-54+353C>G | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | ENST00000316594.6 | NP_062543.1 | ||
| HNRNPH2 | NM_001032393.3 | c.-54+365C>G | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | NP_001027565.1 | |||
| RPL36A-HNRNPH2 | NM_001199973.2 | c.301-3264C>G | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 4 | NP_001186902.2 | |||
| RPL36A-HNRNPH2 | NM_001199974.2 | c.178-3264C>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 3 | NP_001186903.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNRNPH2 | ENST00000316594.6 | c.-54+353C>G | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 1 | 1 | NM_019597.5 | ENSP00000361927.2 | |||
| RPL36A-HNRNPH2 | ENST00000409170.3 | c.301-3264C>G | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 4 | 4 | ENSP00000386655.4 | ||||
| RPL36A-HNRNPH2 | ENST00000409338.5 | c.178-3264C>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 3 | 4 | ENSP00000386974.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0689 AC: 7660AN: 111216Hom.: 206 Cov.: 22 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7660
AN:
111216
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0688 AC: 7654AN: 111268Hom.: 205 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0725 AC XY: 2427AN XY: 33490 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7654
AN:
111268
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
2427
AN XY:
33490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
2039
AN:
30581
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
771
AN:
10544
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
143
AN:
2642
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
281
AN:
3514
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
723
AN:
2625
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
381
AN:
5984
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
217
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
3140
AN:
52969
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
100
AN:
1514
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
246
493
739
986
1232
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
96
192
288
384
480
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Fabry disease Benign:2
Oct 16, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.