rs308365
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_004385.5(VCAN):c.9882C>T(p.Val3294=) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.967 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 755,470 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/2 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004385.5 splice_region, synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCAN | NM_004385.5 | c.9882C>T | p.Val3294= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 14/15 | ENST00000265077.8 | |
VCAN | NM_001164097.2 | c.6921C>T | p.Val2307= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 13/14 | ||
VCAN | NM_001164098.2 | c.4620C>T | p.Val1540= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 13/14 | ||
VCAN | NM_001126336.3 | c.1659C>T | p.Val553= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 12/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCAN | ENST00000265077.8 | c.9882C>T | p.Val3294= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 14/15 | 1 | NM_004385.5 | ||
VCAN-AS1 | ENST00000513899.1 | n.228+1112G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.974 AC: 148231AN: 152204Hom.: 72201 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.975 AC: 244924AN: 251108Hom.: 119477 AF XY: 0.975 AC XY: 132366AN XY: 135744
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.967 AC: 1413159AN: 1461740Hom.: 683207 Cov.: 58 AF XY: 0.967 AC XY: 703263AN XY: 727170
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.974 AC: 148352AN: 152322Hom.: 72263 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.975 AC XY: 72573AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Wagner syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Nov 19, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Vitreoretinopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at