Menu
GeneBe

rs3092829

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.5497-8T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0277 in 1,612,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 710 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.021 ( 36 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.028 ( 674 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00006728
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 11-108304667-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108304667-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 132706.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108304667-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-108304667-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0215 (3271/152312) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0329 (2238/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0318. There are 36 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1549 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 36 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5497-8T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000675843.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.5497-8T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant NM_000051.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3272
AN:
152194
Hom.:
36
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00526
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0251
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0329
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0292
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0225
AC:
5630
AN:
250650
Hom.:
89
AF XY:
0.0226
AC XY:
3059
AN XY:
135528
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00567
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00615
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0333
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0241
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0283
AC:
41334
AN:
1460500
Hom.:
674
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0280
AC XY:
20345
AN XY:
726626
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0251
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00624
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0265
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0324
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0261
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3271
AN:
152312
Hom.:
36
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0208
AC XY:
1549
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00524
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0251
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0329
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0284
Alfa
AF:
0.0299
Hom.:
59
Bravo
AF:
0.0214
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
18
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0329
EpiControl
AF:
0.0321

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterNov 22, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 08, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 02, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJan 12, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsOct 23, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 29, 2013This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 27, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.May 23, 2024This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Triple-negative breast carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM c.5497-8T>C variant was identified in 37 of 1416 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.026) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Concannon 2008, Paglia 2010). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs3092829) as “With Benign allele”, ClinVar (5x, as benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Vantari, PreventionGenetics, Color Genomics), Clinvitae (3x, as benign), Cosmic (4x, in ovary carcinoma, and soft tissue Haemangioblastoma), LOVD 3.0 (1x with "does not affect function"), databases. The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, MutDB and ATM-LOVD, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 6238 (94 homozygous) of 276468 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0225 increasing the likelihood this could be a benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: European (Non-Finnish) in 4209 (69 homozygous) of 126224 chromosomes (freq: 0.033), other in 181 (3 homozygous) of 6446 chromosomes (freq: 0.028), European (Finnish) in 650 (10 homozygous) of 25722 chromosomes (freq: 0.025), Ashkenazi Jewish* in 236 (4 homozygous) of 10138 chromosomes (freq: 0.023), Latino in 631 (7 homozygous) of 34354 chromosomes (freq: 0.018). The c.5497-8T>C variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM c.5497-8T>C variant was identified in 37 of 1416 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.026) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Concannon 2008, Paglia 2010). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs3092829) as “With Benign allele”, ClinVar (5x, as benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Vantari, PreventionGenetics, Color Genomics), Clinvitae (3x, as benign), Cosmic (4x, in ovary carcinoma, and soft tissue Haemangioblastoma), LOVD 3.0 (1x with "does not affect function"), databases. The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, MutDB and ATM-LOVD, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 6238 (94 homozygous) of 276468 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0225 increasing the likelihood this could be a benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: European (Non-Finnish) in 4209 (69 homozygous) of 126224 chromosomes (freq: 0.033), other in 181 (3 homozygous) of 6446 chromosomes (freq: 0.028), European (Finnish) in 650 (10 homozygous) of 25722 chromosomes (freq: 0.025), Ashkenazi Jewish* in 236 (4 homozygous) of 10138 chromosomes (freq: 0.023), Latino in 631 (7 homozygous) of 34354 chromosomes (freq: 0.018). The c.5497-8T>C variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
8.4
DANN
Benign
0.82

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000067
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0040
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3092829; hg19: chr11-108175394; COSMIC: COSV53727999; COSMIC: COSV53727999; API