Menu
GeneBe

rs309370

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_152618.3(BBS12):c.1157G>A(p.Arg386Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.37 in 1,613,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 116,672 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R386W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.42 ( 14660 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.36 ( 102012 hom. )

Consequence

BBS12
NM_152618.3 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0820
Variant links:
Genes affected
BBS12 (HGNC:26648): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12) The protein encoded by this gene is part of a complex that is involved in membrane trafficking. The encoded protein is a molecular chaperone that aids in protein folding upon ATP hydrolysis. This protein also plays a role in adipocyte differentiation. Defects in this gene are a cause of Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 12. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr4-122743048-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=7.769768E-6).
BP6
Variant 4-122743049-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-122743049-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 166725.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-122743049-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.628 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BBS12NM_152618.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1157G>A p.Arg386Gln missense_variant 2/2 ENST00000314218.8
BBS12NM_001178007.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1157G>A p.Arg386Gln missense_variant 3/3
BBS12XM_011531680.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1157G>A p.Arg386Gln missense_variant 2/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BBS12ENST00000314218.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1157G>A p.Arg386Gln missense_variant 2/21 NM_152618.3 P1
BBS12ENST00000542236.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1157G>A p.Arg386Gln missense_variant 3/32 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.424
AC:
64410
AN:
152020
Hom.:
14629
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.560
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.370
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.461
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.358
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.646
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.467
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.276
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.475
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.339
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.420
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.412
AC:
103503
AN:
251214
Hom.:
22936
AF XY:
0.408
AC XY:
55366
AN XY:
135810
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.563
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.489
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.365
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.663
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.473
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.340
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.387
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.365
AC:
533043
AN:
1461750
Hom.:
102012
Cov.:
60
AF XY:
0.367
AC XY:
267119
AN XY:
727168
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.561
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.487
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.363
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.672
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.468
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.292
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.337
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.393
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.424
AC:
64501
AN:
152138
Hom.:
14660
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.425
AC XY:
31587
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.561
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.461
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.358
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.647
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.467
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.276
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.339
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.421
Alfa
AF:
0.368
Hom.:
23089
Bravo
AF:
0.446
TwinsUK
AF:
0.333
AC:
1234
ALSPAC
AF:
0.329
AC:
1269
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.563
AC:
2479
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.338
AC:
2903
ExAC
AF:
0.414
AC:
50226
Asia WGS
AF:
0.594
AC:
2063
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.341
EpiControl
AF:
0.339

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 21, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJun 15, 2021- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 10, 2018- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.66
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
Cadd
Benign
7.1
Dann
Benign
0.76
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.078
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.043
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.23
T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000078
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.13
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.065
Sift
Benign
0.57
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.52
T;T
Polyphen
0.0030
B;B
Vest4
0.019
MPC
0.097
ClinPred
0.0012
T
GERP RS
0.34
Varity_R
0.030
gMVP
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs309370; hg19: chr4-123664204; COSMIC: COSV58563061; COSMIC: COSV58563061; API