rs3097427

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_153704.6(TMEM67):​c.1066-3C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.602 in 1,603,638 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 294,521 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.65 ( 32861 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.60 ( 261660 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM67
NM_153704.6 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004581
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0630
Variant links:
Genes affected
TMEM67 (HGNC:28396): (transmembrane protein 67) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the primary cilium and to the plasma membrane. The gene functions in centriole migration to the apical membrane and formation of the primary cilium. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of Meckel syndrome type 3 (MKS3) and Joubert syndrome type 6 (JBTS6). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 8-93782392-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-93782392-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 96528.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-93782392-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.8 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TMEM67NM_153704.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1066-3C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000453321.8 NP_714915.3 Q5HYA8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TMEM67ENST00000453321.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1066-3C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_153704.6 ENSP00000389998.3 Q5HYA8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.651
AC:
98851
AN:
151840
Hom.:
32804
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.764
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.704
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.668
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.627
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.821
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.632
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.564
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.608
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.582
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.627
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.636
AC:
159161
AN:
250398
Hom.:
51711
AF XY:
0.627
AC XY:
84865
AN XY:
135254
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.771
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.725
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.628
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.836
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.609
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.571
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.578
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.609
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.597
AC:
866613
AN:
1451680
Hom.:
261660
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.596
AC XY:
430950
AN XY:
722606
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.777
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.716
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.633
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.788
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.612
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.576
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.578
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.611
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.651
AC:
98970
AN:
151958
Hom.:
32861
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.652
AC XY:
48440
AN XY:
74250
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.764
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.668
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.627
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.821
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.632
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.564
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.582
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.632
Alfa
AF:
0.612
Hom.:
18661
Bravo
AF:
0.664
Asia WGS
AF:
0.704
AC:
2453
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.581
EpiControl
AF:
0.588

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 07, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 26, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Meckel syndrome, type 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Nephronophthisis 11 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Joubert syndrome 6 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
COACH syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
3.4
DANN
Benign
0.49

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00046
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.14
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3097427; hg19: chr8-94794620; COSMIC: COSV60043346; COSMIC: COSV60043346; API