rs3135722

Variant names:

• chr10-121593699-A-C
• rs3135722
• NM_000141.5:c.109+10T>G

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr10-121593699-A-C
• chr10-121593699-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_000141.5(FGFR2):​c.109+10T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00248 in 1,612,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0076 (13 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 (19 hom.)
• Consequence: FGFR2 NM_000141.5 intron
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.627

Genes affected

FGFR2 (HGNC:3689): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform. Mutations in this gene are associated with Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Craniosynostosis, Apert syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and syndromic craniosynostosis. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2009]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
• BP6: Variant 10-121593699-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-121593699-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255314.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-121593699-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-121593699-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00759 (1156/152290) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0215 (895/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0204. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 536 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 Mitochondrial gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FGFR2	NM_000141.5	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 17	ENST00000358487.10	NP_000132.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FGFR2	ENST00000358487.10	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 17	1	NM_000141.5	ENSP00000351276.6
FGFR2	ENST00000457416.7	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 17	1		ENSP00000410294.2
FGFR2	ENST00000369056.5	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 16	1		ENSP00000358052.1
FGFR2	ENST00000369058.7	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 16	1		ENSP00000358054.3
FGFR2	ENST00000613048.4	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 16	5		ENSP00000484154.1
FGFR2	ENST00000369061.8	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 14	1		ENSP00000358057.4
FGFR2	ENST00000369059.5	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 15	5		ENSP00000358055.1
FGFR2	ENST00000360144.7	c.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 16	2		ENSP00000353262.3
FGFR2	ENST00000604236.5	n.109+10T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 16	1		ENSP00000474109.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00745 AC: 1133 AN: 152172 Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0211

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00949

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00144

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000415

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00123

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0100

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00283 AC: 708 AN: 250594 Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00240 AC XY: 325 AN XY: 135612

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0220

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00477

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00109

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00130

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00408

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00194 AC: 2835 AN: 1460010 Hom.: 19 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00184 AC XY: 1338 AN XY: 726496

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0248

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00503

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00153

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000928

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00123

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00512

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00759 AC: 1156 AN: 152290 Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00720 AC XY: 536 AN XY: 74458

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0215

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00948

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00144

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00123

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0109

Alfa AF: 0.00389 Hom.: 2

Bravo AF: 0.00883

Asia WGS AF: 0.0100 AC: 36 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 21, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 06, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not specified Benign:2

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

FGFR2-related craniosynostosis Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Crouzon syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Isolated Coronal Synostosis Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.81
CADD	Benign	6.2
DANN	Benign	0.69

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3135722; hg19: chr10-123353213; COSMIC: COSV104631725;