rs3135722

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000141.5(FGFR2):​c.109+10T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00248 in 1,612,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0076 ( 13 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

FGFR2
NM_000141.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.627

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FGFR2 (HGNC:3689): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform. Mutations in this gene are associated with Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Craniosynostosis, Apert syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and syndromic craniosynostosis. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2009]
FGFR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Apert syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Crouzon syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • Jackson-Weiss syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • LADD syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • Pfeiffer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • Antley-Bixler syndrome without genital anomalies or disordered steroidogenesis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • bent bone dysplasia syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • familial scaphocephaly syndrome, McGillivray type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Saethre-Chotzen syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Antley-Bixler syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • LADD syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Pfeiffer syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Pfeiffer syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Pfeiffer syndrome type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 10-121593699-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-121593699-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255314.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00759 (1156/152290) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0215 (895/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0204. There are 13 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 536 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1156 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FGFR2NM_000141.5 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 17 ENST00000358487.10 NP_000132.3 P21802-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FGFR2ENST00000358487.10 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 17 1 NM_000141.5 ENSP00000351276.6 P21802-1
FGFR2ENST00000457416.7 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 17 1 ENSP00000410294.2 P21802-3
FGFR2ENST00000369056.5 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 16 1 ENSP00000358052.1 P21802-17
FGFR2ENST00000369058.7 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 16 1 ENSP00000358054.3 A0A5S6RJB7
FGFR2ENST00000613048.4 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 16 5 ENSP00000484154.1 D2CGD1
FGFR2ENST00000369061.8 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 14 1 ENSP00000358057.4 P21802-23
FGFR2ENST00000369059.5 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 15 5 ENSP00000358055.1 E7EVR7
FGFR2ENST00000360144.7 linkc.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 16 2 ENSP00000353262.3 P21802-22
FGFR2ENST00000604236.5 linkn.109+10T>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 16 1 ENSP00000474109.1 S4R3B2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00745
AC:
1133
AN:
152172
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0211
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0100
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00283
AC:
708
AN:
250594
AF XY:
0.00240
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00477
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00408
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00194
AC:
2835
AN:
1460010
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00184
AC XY:
1338
AN XY:
726496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0248
AC:
829
AN:
33438
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00503
AC:
225
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00153
AC:
40
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39684
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000928
AC:
8
AN:
86230
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00972
AC:
56
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
1367
AN:
1110324
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00512
AC:
309
AN:
60326
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
139
279
418
558
697
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
70
140
210
280
350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00759
AC:
1156
AN:
152290
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00720
AC XY:
536
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0215
AC:
895
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00948
AC:
145
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
84
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
23
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
59
118
177
236
295
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00436
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00883
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0100
AC:
36
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Feb 21, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 06, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

FGFR2-related craniosynostosis Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Crouzon syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Isolated Coronal Synostosis Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
0.63
PromoterAI
-0.0050
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3135722; hg19: chr10-123353213; API