rs3192177

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001079.4(ZAP70):​c.1677G>A​(p.Glu559Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.321 in 1,611,638 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 91,892 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.27 ( 6889 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.33 ( 85003 hom. )

Consequence

ZAP70
NM_001079.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.295

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ZAP70 (HGNC:12858): (zeta chain of T cell receptor associated protein kinase 70) This gene encodes an enzyme belonging to the protein tyrosine kinase family, and it plays a role in T-cell development and lymphocyte activation. This enzyme, which is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues upon T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) stimulation, functions in the initial step of TCR-mediated signal transduction in combination with the Src family kinases, Lck and Fyn. This enzyme is also essential for thymocyte development. Mutations in this gene cause selective T-cell defect, a severe combined immunodeficiency disease characterized by a selective absence of CD8-positive T-cells. Two transcript variants that encode different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ZAP70 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • combined immunodeficiency due to ZAP70 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 2-97738048-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-97738048-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 137941.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.295 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.353 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ZAP70NM_001079.4 linkc.1677G>A p.Glu559Glu synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 14 ENST00000264972.10 NP_001070.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ZAP70ENST00000264972.10 linkc.1677G>A p.Glu559Glu synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 14 1 NM_001079.4 ENSP00000264972.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.268
AC:
40743
AN:
151912
Hom.:
6890
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.123
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.427
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.232
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.186
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00769
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.125
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.537
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.199
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.357
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.228
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.273
AC:
67253
AN:
246492
AF XY:
0.273
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.121
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.189
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.201
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00666
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.528
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.359
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.275
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.327
AC:
476616
AN:
1459610
Hom.:
85003
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
0.321
AC XY:
232951
AN XY:
726020
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.114
AC:
3817
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.193
AC:
8532
AN:
44258
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.204
AC:
5336
AN:
26102
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00550
AC:
218
AN:
39650
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.139
AC:
11992
AN:
86042
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.520
AC:
27675
AN:
53264
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.164
AC:
945
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.361
AC:
401196
AN:
1110790
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.280
AC:
16905
AN:
60282
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20395
40790
61184
81579
101974
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
12366
24732
37098
49464
61830
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.268
AC:
40741
AN:
152028
Hom.:
6889
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.272
AC XY:
20211
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.123
AC:
5093
AN:
41458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.231
AC:
3534
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.186
AC:
645
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00771
AC:
40
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.125
AC:
602
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.537
AC:
5681
AN:
10582
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.204
AC:
60
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.357
AC:
24224
AN:
67920
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.225
AC:
473
AN:
2102
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1408
2815
4223
5630
7038
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
402
804
1206
1608
2010
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.316
Hom.:
8346
Bravo
AF:
0.239
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0840
AC:
293
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Jan 07, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 11, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2023
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 39% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 37. Only high quality variants are reported. -

not provided Benign:1Other:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

ZAP70-Related Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Combined immunodeficiency due to ZAP70 deficiency Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
7.5
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
-0.29
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3192177; hg19: chr2-98354511; COSMIC: COSV53856101; COSMIC: COSV53856101; API