rs3195678
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_014324.6(AMACR):c.782T>C(p.Met261Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00218 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 87 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M261I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014324.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_014324.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMACR | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.782T>C | p.Met261Thr | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000334424.6 | Q9UHK6-1 | ||
| AMACR | TSL:1 | c.782T>C | p.Met261Thr | missense | Exon 5 of 6 | ENSP00000371517.3 | Q9UHK6-5 | ||
| AMACR | TSL:1 | c.*24T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000371504.2 | Q9UHK6-4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0119 AC: 1805AN: 152198Hom.: 46 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00287 AC: 721AN: 251300 AF XY: 0.00206 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00116 AC: 1703AN: 1461870Hom.: 40 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00102 AC XY: 741AN XY: 727236 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0119 AC: 1820AN: 152316Hom.: 47 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0115 AC XY: 856AN XY: 74490 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at