rs3195678
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_014324.6(AMACR):āc.782T>Cā(p.Met261Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00218 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 87 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014324.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMACR | NM_014324.6 | c.782T>C | p.Met261Thr | missense_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000335606.11 | NP_055139.4 | |
C1QTNF3-AMACR | NR_037951.1 | n.1138T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/9 | ||||
AMACR | NM_001167595.2 | c.782T>C | p.Met261Thr | missense_variant | 5/6 | NP_001161067.1 | ||
AMACR | NM_203382.3 | c.*24T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | NP_976316.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMACR | ENST00000335606.11 | c.782T>C | p.Met261Thr | missense_variant | 5/5 | 1 | NM_014324.6 | ENSP00000334424 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0119 AC: 1805AN: 152198Hom.: 46 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00287 AC: 721AN: 251300Hom.: 23 AF XY: 0.00206 AC XY: 280AN XY: 135830
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00116 AC: 1703AN: 1461870Hom.: 40 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00102 AC XY: 741AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0119 AC: 1820AN: 152316Hom.: 47 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0115 AC XY: 856AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 19, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 17, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase deficiency Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 24, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Congenital bile acid synthesis defect 4;C3280428:Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 08, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at