rs3210083
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP5
The NM_005002.5(NDUFA9):c.1078C>T(p.Arg360Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000103 in 1,461,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R360H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005002.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen
- Leigh syndrome with leukodystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 26Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005002.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDUFA9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1078C>T | p.Arg360Cys | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000266544.5 | Q16795 | ||
| ENSG00000255639 | c.963+1727C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000497305.1 | A0A3B3ISG8 | ||||
| NDUFA9 | c.1183C>T | p.Arg395Cys | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000522839.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251374 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at