rs3218537

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_005431.2(XRCC2):c.662T>C(p.Ile221Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000031 in 1,614,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000019 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

XRCC2
NM_005431.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.105

Variant links:

Genes affected

XRCC2 (HGNC:12829): (X-ray repair cross complementing 2) This gene encodes a member of the RecA/Rad51-related protein family that participates in homologous recombination to maintain chromosome stability and repair DNA damage. This gene is involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination and it functionally complements Chinese hamster irs1, a repair-deficient mutant that exhibits hypersensitivity to a number of different DNA-damaging agents. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

XRCC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011204004).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000144 (22/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000529 (22/41556). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000358. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
XRCC2	NM_005431.2 link	c.662T>C	p.Ile221Thr	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 3	ENST00000359321.2	NP_005422.1	O43543A0A384MEK2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
XRCC2	ENST00000359321.2 link	c.662T>C	p.Ile221Thr	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 3	1	NM_005431.2	ENSP00000352271.1	O43543
XRCC2	ENST00000495707.1 link	n.684T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 3 of 3	1
XRCC2	ENST00000698506.1 link	c.494T>C	p.Ile165Thr	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 2			ENSP00000513758.1	A0A8V8TMB7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000145

AC:

AN:

152194

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000531

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000517

AC:

AN:

251390

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000442

AC XY:

AN XY:

135850

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000677

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000192

AC:

AN:

1461700

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000165

AC XY:

AN XY:

727112

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000717

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000144

AC:

AN:

152312

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000201

AC XY:

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000529

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000970

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000132

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000576

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Mar 03, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is denoted XRCC2 c.662T>C at the cDNA level, p.Ile221Thr (I221T) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Isoleucine to a Threonine (ATA>ACA). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. XRCC2 Ile221Thr was not observed at a significant allele frequency in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project or 1000 Genomes. Since Isoleucine and Threonine differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution. XRCC2 Ile221Thr occurs at a position that is not conserved, and is located within the ATPase domain (Kim and Choi 2011). In silico analyses predict that this variant is unlikely to alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether XRCC2 Ile221Thr is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -

Fanconi anemia complementation group U

Uncertain:1

Aug 05, 2024

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The XRCC2 c.662T>C (p.Ile221Thr) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.072% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with XRCC2-associated Fanconi anemia.In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Dec 11, 2023

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 221 of the XRCC2 protein (p.Ile221Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs3218537, gnomAD 0.07%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with XRCC2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 409968). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The threonine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 30, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.054

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.45

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

0.15

DANN

Benign

0.63

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.058

Eigen

Benign

-1.2

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.011

LIST_S2

Benign

0.43

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.55

PrimateAI

Benign

0.26

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.18

REVEL

Benign

0.050

Sift

Benign

0.54

Sift4G

Benign

0.18

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.034

MVP

0.16

MPC

0.042

ClinPred

0.011

GERP RS

-2.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.019

gMVP

0.14

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over