rs3218773

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):​c.56G>A​(p.Arg19His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00163 in 1,600,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R19L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 27 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.22

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
POLD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • POLD1-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • mandibular hypoplasia-deafness-progeroid syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, G2P
  • Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • immunodeficiency 120
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • non-severe combined immunodeficiency due to polymerase delta deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0031368136).
BP6
Variant 19-50398907-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50398907-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 221055.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00236 (359/152386) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0353 (183/5190). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0311. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 198 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkc.56G>A p.Arg19His missense_variant Exon 2 of 27 ENST00000440232.7 NP_002682.2 P28340A0A024R4F4Q59FA0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkc.56G>A p.Arg19His missense_variant Exon 2 of 27 1 NM_002691.4 ENSP00000406046.1 P28340

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00238
AC:
362
AN:
152268
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000916
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00706
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0356
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00539
AC:
1222
AN:
226642
AF XY:
0.00471
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000787
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00300
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0344
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00447
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00155
AC:
2246
AN:
1448134
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00144
AC XY:
1034
AN XY:
719010
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000690
AC:
23
AN:
33320
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0154
AC:
658
AN:
42656
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00234
AC:
60
AN:
25692
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0275
AC:
1081
AN:
39302
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000667
AC:
56
AN:
83954
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000191
AC:
1
AN:
52332
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4168
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000201
AC:
222
AN:
1106964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
145
AN:
59746
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
129
258
386
515
644
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00236
AC:
359
AN:
152386
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00266
AC XY:
198
AN XY:
74518
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000914
AC:
38
AN:
41594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00699
AC:
107
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0353
AC:
183
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
8
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10632
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000191
AC:
13
AN:
68040
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
5
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
36
55
73
91
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00134
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00339
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000909
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00410
AC:
497
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0160
AC:
54
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Jul 13, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 07, 2017
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 29, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 12, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

POLD1: BS1, BS2 -

Jul 21, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The POLD1 c.56G>A (p.Arg19His) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. This variant is located in the nuclear localization signal domain and 2/3 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index), however no functional studies supporting these predictions were published at the time of evaluation. This variant was found in 434/63048 control chromosomes (6 homozygotes), observed at relatively higher frequency in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0458626 (235/5124). This frequency is about 3229 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLD1 variant (0.0000142), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Lastly, the variant was identified internally in one individual with personal and family history of FAP, who tested positive for a pathogenic variant, c.2161_2170delGGAAGTGCTG in APC gene. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Jul 14, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Dec 11, 2015
Vantari Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 30, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 20, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:3
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 05, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10;C3715192:Mandibular hypoplasia-deafness-progeroid syndrome Benign:1
Sep 02, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The POLD1 p.Arg19His variant was identified in 6 of 152 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.04) from individuals or families with HNPCC and endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (Talseth-Palmer 2015, Wong 2016 ). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs3218773) as With Likely benign allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, Counsyl, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and two clinical laboratories; as likely benign by Vantari Genetics), Clinvitae, and MutDB databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1238 of 252406 chromosomes (18 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.01 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 19 of 21738 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Other in 24 of 5994 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Latino in 520 of 31786 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), European in 26 of 114472 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Ashkenazi Jewish in 28 of 9430 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), East Asian in 604 of 17564 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), and South Asian in 17 of 27984 chromosomes (freq: 0.001); but not in the Finnish population. The p.Arg19 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.32
T;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.41
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.39
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.38
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
.;.;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0031
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.55
N;.;.;.;N;.
PhyloP100
3.2
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.67
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;.;.;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.048
Sift
Benign
0.058
T;.;.;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.21
T;T;D;T;T;D
Polyphen
0.0010
B;.;.;.;B;.
Vest4
0.24
MVP
0.43
MPC
0.23
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
3.1
PromoterAI
-0.0054
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.053
gMVP
0.25
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3218773; hg19: chr19-50902164; API