rs3219466

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001128425.2(MUTYH):​c.-127C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0307 in 1,553,774 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 862 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 59 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.032 ( 803 hom. )

Consequence

MUTYH
NM_001128425.2 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.442
Variant links:
Genes affected
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]
TOE1 (HGNC:15954): (target of EGR1, exonuclease) Enables poly(A)-specific ribonuclease activity and snRNA binding activity. Involved in RNA phosphodiester bond hydrolysis, exonucleolytic and snRNA 3'-end processing. Located in Cajal body and cytoplasm. Implicated in pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 7. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 1-45340381-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45340381-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 428279.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=2, Benign=1}. Variant chr1-45340381-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0215 (3278/152344) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0342 (2324/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.033. There are 59 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1539 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position FAILED quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 59 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TOE1NM_025077.4 linkc.52+77G>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 7 ENST00000372090.6 NP_079353.3 Q96GM8-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TOE1ENST00000372090.6 linkc.52+77G>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 7 1 NM_025077.4 ENSP00000361162.5 Q96GM8-1
ENSG00000288208ENST00000671898.1 linkn.541-5870C>T intron_variant Intron 5 of 20 ENSP00000499896.1 A0A5F9ZGZ0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3279
AN:
152226
Hom.:
59
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0210
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000384
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0342
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0234
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0317
AC:
44373
AN:
1401430
Hom.:
803
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0316
AC XY:
21841
AN XY:
691954
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00508
AC:
161
AN:
31714
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0114
AC:
412
AN:
36046
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0272
AC:
686
AN:
25212
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000557
AC:
2
AN:
35912
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0195
AC:
1552
AN:
79498
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0251
AC:
1179
AN:
47010
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0356
AC:
38532
AN:
1082174
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.0291
AC:
1695
AN:
58186
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2769
5539
8308
11078
13847
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1446
2892
4338
5784
7230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3278
AN:
152344
Hom.:
59
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0207
AC XY:
1539
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00589
AC:
0.00589254
AN:
0.00589254
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0153
AC:
0.0152841
AN:
0.0152841
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0210
AC:
0.0210496
AN:
0.0210496
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000385
AC:
0.00038506
AN:
0.00038506
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0176
AC:
0.0175983
AN:
0.0175983
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0233
AC:
0.0232755
AN:
0.0232755
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0342
AC:
0.0341594
AN:
0.0341594
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0232
AC:
0.0231788
AN:
0.0231788
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
166
331
497
662
828
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0317
Hom.:
52
Bravo
AF:
0.0207
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00693
AC:
24
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
May 11, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Jan 10, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

There is insufficient or conflicting evidence for classification of this alteration. -

Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Benign:2
Sep 06, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not provided Uncertain:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
9.4
DANN
Benign
0.78
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3219466; hg19: chr1-45806053; API