rs3219495
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):c.1434+73C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0129 in 1,470,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,054 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.066 ( 1173 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0067 ( 881 hom. )
Consequence
MUTYH
NM_001048174.2 intron
NM_001048174.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.212
Publications
5 publications found
Genes affected
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]
MUTYH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- familial adenomatous polyposis 2Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, G2P
- colorectal cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 1-45330443-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45330443-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 1260412.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.227 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUTYH | ENST00000456914.7 | c.1434+73C>T | intron_variant | Intron 15 of 15 | 1 | NM_001048174.2 | ENSP00000407590.2 | |||
| ENSG00000288208 | ENST00000671898.1 | n.2022+73C>T | intron_variant | Intron 19 of 20 | ENSP00000499896.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0663 AC: 10068AN: 151814Hom.: 1174 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
10068
AN:
151814
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00671 AC: 8851AN: 1319058Hom.: 881 AF XY: 0.00584 AC XY: 3838AN XY: 657010 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
8851
AN:
1319058
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3838
AN XY:
657010
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
7109
AN:
29936
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
526
AN:
37478
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
24674
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
36284
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
39
AN:
78404
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
50362
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
40
AN:
5526
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
319
AN:
1001010
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
814
AN:
55384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
340
681
1021
1362
1702
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
198
396
594
792
990
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0663 AC: 10068AN: 151932Hom.: 1173 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0647 AC XY: 4802AN XY: 74254 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
10068
AN:
151932
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
4802
AN XY:
74254
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
9532
AN:
41326
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
400
AN:
15276
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
10568
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
36
AN:
68002
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
88
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
367
734
1102
1469
1836
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
92
184
276
368
460
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.