Menu
GeneBe

rs34067308

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):c.660C>T(p.Ala220=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0828 in 1,613,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,190 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.066 ( 418 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.084 ( 5772 hom. )

Consequence

MYO3A
NM_017433.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0710
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 10-26021577-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-26021577-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45822.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-26021577-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.071 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0922 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO3ANM_017433.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.660C>T p.Ala220= synonymous_variant 8/35 ENST00000642920.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO3AENST00000642920.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.660C>T p.Ala220= synonymous_variant 8/35 NM_017433.5 P1Q8NEV4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0665
AC:
10111
AN:
152054
Hom.:
417
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0276
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0154
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0757
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0978
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000963
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0693
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0665
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0942
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0742
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0675
AC:
16974
AN:
251412
Hom.:
760
AF XY:
0.0684
AC XY:
9298
AN XY:
135866
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0271
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0521
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0927
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0320
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0701
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0950
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0797
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0845
AC:
123507
AN:
1461710
Hom.:
5772
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0833
AC XY:
60571
AN XY:
727164
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0257
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0547
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0918
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000302
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0330
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0736
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0953
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0786
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0665
AC:
10112
AN:
152172
Hom.:
418
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0646
AC XY:
4808
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0276
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0756
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0978
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000966
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0288
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0693
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0942
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0743
Alfa
AF:
0.0845
Hom.:
308
Bravo
AF:
0.0666
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0310
AC:
110
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0929
EpiControl
AF:
0.103

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Ala220Ala in Exon 08 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 9.6% (673/7020) of E uropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs34067308). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
Cadd
Benign
8.7
Dann
Benign
0.54

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34067308; hg19: chr10-26310506; API