rs34071122
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_019892.6(INPP5E):c.636C>A(p.Val212Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00215 in 1,612,226 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 83 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019892.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Joubert syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- MORM syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Orphanet
- COACH syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Joubert syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Joubert syndrome with ocular defectInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INPP5E | NM_019892.6 | c.636C>A | p.Val212Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | ENST00000371712.4 | NP_063945.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INPP5E | ENST00000371712.4 | c.636C>A | p.Val212Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | 1 | NM_019892.6 | ENSP00000360777.3 | ||
| INPP5E | ENST00000676019.1 | c.636C>A | p.Val212Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | ENSP00000501984.1 | ||||
| INPP5E | ENST00000635815.1 | n.1040C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | 6 | |||||
| INPP5E | ENST00000674513.1 | n.-94C>A | upstream_gene_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0115 AC: 1755AN: 152208Hom.: 38 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00283 AC: 689AN: 243054 AF XY: 0.00218 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00117 AC: 1704AN: 1459900Hom.: 45 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 737AN XY: 726262 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0116 AC: 1760AN: 152326Hom.: 38 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0105 AC XY: 782AN XY: 74484 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Joubert syndrome Benign:1
- -
MORM syndrome;C4551568:Joubert syndrome 1 Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Joubert syndrome 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at