rs34076967
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.1858C>A(p.Gln620Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000974 in 1,613,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0052 ( 7 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 7 hom. )
Consequence
DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense
NM_001369.3 missense
Scores
6
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.71
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011298478).
BP6
Variant 5-13901446-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13901446-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226597.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00516 (786/152264) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0181 (752/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.017. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 361 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.1858C>A | p.Gln620Lys | missense_variant | 14/79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | ENSP00000265104.4 | ||
DNAH5 | ENST00000681290.1 | c.1813C>A | p.Gln605Lys | missense_variant | 14/79 | ENSP00000505288.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00517 AC: 786AN: 152146Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
786
AN:
152146
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00130 AC: 323AN: 249302Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000964 AC XY: 130AN XY: 134848
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
323
AN:
249302
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
130
AN XY:
134848
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000538 AC: 786AN: 1461718Hom.: 7 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000488 AC XY: 355AN XY: 727144
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
786
AN:
1461718
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
355
AN XY:
727144
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00516 AC: 786AN: 152264Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00485 AC XY: 361AN XY: 74436
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
786
AN:
152264
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
361
AN XY:
74436
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
69
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
182
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 11, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 26, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 21, 2013 | Gln620Lys in exon 14 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1.6% (69/4406) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs34076967). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 04, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at