rs34098809
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_203447.4(DOCK8):c.5211G>A(p.Glu1737=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00339 in 1,613,434 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 46 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0093 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 29 hom. )
Consequence
DOCK8
NM_203447.4 synonymous
NM_203447.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.253
Genes affected
DOCK8 (HGNC:19191): (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) This gene encodes a member of the DOCK180 family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors interact with Rho GTPases and are components of intracellular signaling networks. Mutations in this gene result in the autosomal recessive form of the hyper-IgE syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BP6
Variant 9-439376-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-439376-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137150.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-439376-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.253 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00931 (1418/152262) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0257 (1068/41544). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0244. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 655 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 17 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCK8 | NM_203447.4 | c.5211G>A | p.Glu1737= | synonymous_variant | 40/48 | ENST00000432829.7 | NP_982272.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCK8 | ENST00000432829.7 | c.5211G>A | p.Glu1737= | synonymous_variant | 40/48 | 1 | NM_203447.4 | ENSP00000394888 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00926 AC: 1409AN: 152144Hom.: 16 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1409
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00450 AC: 1127AN: 250594Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00403 AC XY: 546AN XY: 135492
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1127
AN:
250594
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
546
AN XY:
135492
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00278 AC: 4059AN: 1461172Hom.: 29 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00269 AC XY: 1959AN XY: 726906
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4059
AN:
1461172
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1959
AN XY:
726906
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00931 AC: 1418AN: 152262Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00880 AC XY: 655AN XY: 74456
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1418
AN:
152262
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
655
AN XY:
74456
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 26, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 08, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 21, 2013 | Glu1737Glu in exon 40 of DOCK8: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 2.5% (111/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenc ing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs34098809). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive hyper-IgE syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at