rs34102501
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_004006.3(DMD):c.5182C>T(p.Arg1728Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000549 in 1,208,526 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. There are 181 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 3 hom., 96 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 2 hom. 85 hem. )
Consequence
DMD
NM_004006.3 missense
NM_004006.3 missense
Scores
2
4
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.09
Genes affected
DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0078805685).
BP6
Variant X-32362931-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-32362931-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 94656.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=7}. Variant chrX-32362931-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-32362931-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00295 (328/111112) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00965 (295/30577). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00874. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 96 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 22. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | NM_004006.3 | c.5182C>T | p.Arg1728Cys | missense_variant | 37/79 | ENST00000357033.9 | NP_003997.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | ENST00000357033.9 | c.5182C>T | p.Arg1728Cys | missense_variant | 37/79 | 1 | NM_004006.3 | ENSP00000354923.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00294 AC: 327AN: 111055Hom.: 3 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00289 AC XY: 96AN XY: 33263
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
327
AN:
111055
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
96
AN XY:
33263
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000776 AC: 141AN: 181795Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 25AN XY: 66469
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
141
AN:
181795
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
66469
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000306 AC: 336AN: 1097414Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000234 AC XY: 85AN XY: 362854
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
336
AN:
1097414
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
362854
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00295 AC: 328AN: 111112Hom.: 3 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00288 AC XY: 96AN XY: 33330
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
328
AN:
111112
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
96
AN XY:
33330
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
33
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
99
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 13, 2019 | Variant summary: DMD c.5182C>T (p.Arg1728Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the central rod domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00099 in 203656 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0097 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 880 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DMD causing Dystrophinopathies phenotype (1.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign (5x) and likely benign (2x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 21, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 10, 2017 | p.Arg1728Cys in exon 37 of DMD: This variant is classified as benign because it has been identified in 0.9% (180/18042) of African chromosomes, including 48 hem izygotes and 1 homozygote, by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gn omad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs34102501). - |
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 09, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Aug 28, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 01, 2017 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Aug 09, 2017 | - - |
DMD-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 10, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 03, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T;.;.
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
.;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.093
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at