rs34213258
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_024915.4(GRHL2):c.1572A>G(p.Pro524Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0083 in 1,614,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 352 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024915.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 28Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen
- posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophyInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P
- nail and teeth abnormalities-marginal palmoplantar keratoderma-oral hyperpigmentation syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- congenital fibrosis of extraocular musclesInheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRHL2 | NM_024915.4 | c.1572A>G | p.Pro524Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | ENST00000646743.1 | NP_079191.2 | |
| GRHL2 | NM_001330593.2 | c.1524A>G | p.Pro508Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | NP_001317522.1 | ||
| GRHL2 | NM_001440448.1 | c.1524A>G | p.Pro508Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | NP_001427377.1 | ||
| GRHL2 | NM_001440447.1 | c.1572A>G | p.Pro524Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | NP_001427376.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRHL2 | ENST00000646743.1 | c.1572A>G | p.Pro524Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | NM_024915.4 | ENSP00000495564.1 | |||
| GRHL2 | ENST00000395927.1 | c.1524A>G | p.Pro508Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 16 | 2 | ENSP00000379260.1 | |||
| GRHL2 | ENST00000474338.1 | n.214A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 4 | 3 | |||||
| GRHL2 | ENST00000517674.5 | n.227A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 3 of 4 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0277 AC: 4223AN: 152194Hom.: 170 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0127 AC: 3185AN: 251318 AF XY: 0.0104 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00626 AC: 9152AN: 1461762Hom.: 181 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00590 AC XY: 4289AN XY: 727200 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0279 AC: 4244AN: 152312Hom.: 171 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0272 AC XY: 2023AN XY: 74492 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Pro524Pro in Exon 13 of GRHL2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 7.8% (292/3738) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs34213258). -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at