rs34252199

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_015404.4(WHRN):​c.1515G>A​(p.Ala505Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0438 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,705 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 89 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.045 ( 1616 hom. )

Consequence

WHRN
NM_015404.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.31
Variant links:
Genes affected
WHRN (HGNC:16361): (whirlin) This gene is thought to function in the organization and stabilization of sterocilia elongation and actin cystoskeletal assembly, based on studies of the related mouse gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness and Usher Syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 9-114423425-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-114423425-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45655.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-114423425-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.31 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0524 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
WHRNNM_015404.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1515G>A p.Ala505Ala synonymous_variant 7/12 ENST00000362057.4 NP_056219.3 Q9P202-1B9EGE6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WHRNENST00000362057.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1515G>A p.Ala505Ala synonymous_variant 7/121 NM_015404.4 ENSP00000354623.3 Q9P202-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0309
AC:
4698
AN:
152052
Hom.:
89
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0713
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0326
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0270
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0490
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0301
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0306
AC:
7700
AN:
251446
Hom.:
165
AF XY:
0.0312
AC XY:
4237
AN XY:
135894
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00800
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0219
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00223
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0477
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0305
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0451
AC:
65939
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
1616
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0445
AC XY:
32343
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00803
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00589
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0250
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0528
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0391
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0309
AC:
4696
AN:
152170
Hom.:
89
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0295
AC XY:
2197
AN XY:
74396
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0326
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0135
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00387
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0270
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0490
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0294
Alfa
AF:
0.0394
Hom.:
54
Bravo
AF:
0.0304
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0260
AC:
90
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0442
EpiControl
AF:
0.0443

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 25, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 12, 2009- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsFeb 12, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 2D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
0.48
DANN
Benign
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34252199; hg19: chr9-117185705; API