rs34291397
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.56C>T(p.Pro19Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000693 in 1,613,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00057 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00071 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense
NM_000123.4 missense
Scores
1
6
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.30
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.17637151).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | NM_000123.4 | c.56C>T | p.Pro19Leu | missense_variant | 1/15 | ENST00000652225.2 | NP_000114.3 | |
BIVM-ERCC5 | NM_001204425.2 | c.1451-5796C>T | intron_variant | NP_001191354.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.56C>T | p.Pro19Leu | missense_variant | 1/15 | NM_000123.4 | ENSP00000498881 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000572 AC: 87AN: 152126Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
87
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000585 AC: 146AN: 249366Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000570 AC XY: 77AN XY: 135158
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
146
AN:
249366
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
135158
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000706 AC: 1032AN: 1461806Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000715 AC XY: 520AN XY: 727206
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1032
AN:
1461806
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
520
AN XY:
727206
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000572 AC: 87AN: 152126Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000525 AC XY: 39AN XY: 74314
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
87
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
74314
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
AC:
79
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | ERCC5: BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 20, 2023 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30086788, 29641532, 27498913, 28137924, 24728327, 31937788, 30306255, 33821390) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 23, 2022 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 19 of the ERCC5 protein (p.Pro19Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs34291397, gnomAD 0.1%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ERCC5-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 134159). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 07, 2024 | Variant summary: ERCC5 c.56C>T (p.Pro19Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the XPG, N-terminal domain (IPR006085) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00059 in 249366 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ERCC5 causing Xeroderma Pigmentosum phenotype (0.00019). c.56C>T has been reported in the literature in several cancer cohorts (e.g., dosSantos_2022) and in a cohort of children with various rare genetic diseases (e.g., Chirita-Emandi_2020), but has not been reported in any individuals clearly affected with Xeroderma Pigmentosum to our knowledge. These reports therefore do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Xeroderma Pigmentosum. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 31937788, 32573973, 36077770). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 134159). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 25, 2021 | The c.56C>T (p.P19L) alteration is located in exon 1 (coding exon 1) of the ERCC5 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 56, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 19 to be replaced by a leucine (L). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Aug 30, 2020 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at