Menu
GeneBe

rs34309943

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6220C>A(p.His2074Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000461 in 1,612,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H2074?) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:24O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.319
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr13-32340575-CAC-AA is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 52036.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009914428).
BP6
Variant 13-32340575-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340575-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 38028.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32340575-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00242 (369/152274) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00837 (348/41556). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00765. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 175 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6220C>A p.His2074Asn missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6220C>A p.His2074Asn missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00243
AC:
369
AN:
152156
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00840
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000737
AC:
184
AN:
249564
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000548
AC XY:
74
AN XY:
135002
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00984
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000672
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000256
AC:
374
AN:
1459734
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
0.000223
AC XY:
162
AN XY:
726040
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00873
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000787
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000647
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00242
AC:
369
AN:
152274
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00235
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00837
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000474
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00294
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0102
AC:
45
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000923
AC:
112
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:24Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 10, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 06, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 04, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchResearch Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of TorontoJan 31, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 17, 2021The p.His2074Asn variant in BRCA2 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 0.98% (243/24870) of African chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 28, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000313 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Apr 20, 2011- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 10, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 17, 2021- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioNov 04, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research-- -
Fanconi anemia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesDec 13, 2019- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.His2074Asn variant has been identified in one out of 190 control chromosomes (frequency 0.005), and also listed 39X in the BI(C database as a variant of unknown clinical significance (Wagner 1999). It is also listed in dbSNP database coming from a “clinical channel” (ID#: rs34309943) with a “global minor allele frequency of 0.001 (1000 genomes), therefore increasing the likelihood that this variant is benign. In the Exome Variant Server, this variant was also found in 45 times out of 12955 chromosomes (0 out of 8594 European, and 45 out of 4361 African alleles) further suggesting that the variant is benign. The p.His2074 residue is not conserved in mammals or in other species, and the computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. In summary, based on above information this variant is classified as Benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
Cadd
Benign
6.5
Dann
Benign
0.78
Eigen
Benign
-0.90
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.88
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.33
N
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0099
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.20
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.22
T;T
Vest4
0.36
MVP
0.83
MPC
0.021
ClinPred
0.0043
T
GERP RS
-4.1
gMVP
0.18

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34309943; hg19: chr13-32914712; API