rs34453495
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000108.5(DLD):āc.1422A>Cā(p.Gly474Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0113 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 119 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0089 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.012 ( 113 hom. )
Consequence
DLD
NM_000108.5 synonymous
NM_000108.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.780
Genes affected
DLD (HGNC:2898): (dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase) This gene encodes a member of the class-I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions. In homodimeric form, the encoded protein functions as a dehydrogenase and is found in several multi-enzyme complexes that regulate energy metabolism. However, as a monomer, this protein can function as a protease. Mutations in this gene have been identified in patients with E3-deficient maple syrup urine disease and lipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 7-107919057-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107919057-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137101.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-107919057-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr7-107919057-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.78 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0089 (1356/152324) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0133 (906/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0126. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 658 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLD | NM_000108.5 | c.1422A>C | p.Gly474Gly | synonymous_variant | 13/14 | ENST00000205402.10 | NP_000099.2 | |
DLD | NM_001289751.1 | c.1353A>C | p.Gly451Gly | synonymous_variant | 12/13 | NP_001276680.1 | ||
DLD | NM_001289752.1 | c.1278A>C | p.Gly426Gly | synonymous_variant | 12/13 | NP_001276681.1 | ||
DLD | NM_001289750.1 | c.1125A>C | p.Gly375Gly | synonymous_variant | 11/12 | NP_001276679.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLD | ENST00000205402.10 | c.1422A>C | p.Gly474Gly | synonymous_variant | 13/14 | 1 | NM_000108.5 | ENSP00000205402.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00892 AC: 1357AN: 152206Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1357
AN:
152206
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00874 AC: 2196AN: 251288Hom.: 20 AF XY: 0.00875 AC XY: 1189AN XY: 135812
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2196
AN:
251288
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1189
AN XY:
135812
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0115 AC: 16819AN: 1461626Hom.: 113 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0111 AC XY: 8105AN XY: 727124
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
16819
AN:
1461626
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
8105
AN XY:
727124
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00890 AC: 1356AN: 152324Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00883 AC XY: 658AN XY: 74490
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1356
AN:
152324
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
658
AN XY:
74490
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 08, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 06, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | DLD: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 02, 2011 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at