rs34453495

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000108.5(DLD):​c.1422A>C​(p.Gly474Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0113 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 119 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G474G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 113 hom. )

Consequence

DLD
NM_000108.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.780

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DLD (HGNC:2898): (dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase) This gene encodes a member of the class-I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions. In homodimeric form, the encoded protein functions as a dehydrogenase and is found in several multi-enzyme complexes that regulate energy metabolism. However, as a monomer, this protein can function as a protease. Mutations in this gene have been identified in patients with E3-deficient maple syrup urine disease and lipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
DLD Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Leigh syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 7-107919057-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107919057-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 137101.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.78 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0089 (1356/152324) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0133 (906/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0126. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 658 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DLDNM_000108.5 linkc.1422A>C p.Gly474Gly synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 14 ENST00000205402.10 NP_000099.2 P09622-1A0A024R713
DLDNM_001289751.1 linkc.1353A>C p.Gly451Gly synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 13 NP_001276680.1 P09622E9PEX6
DLDNM_001289752.1 linkc.1278A>C p.Gly426Gly synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 13 NP_001276681.1 P09622-3
DLDNM_001289750.1 linkc.1125A>C p.Gly375Gly synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 12 NP_001276679.1 P09622-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DLDENST00000205402.10 linkc.1422A>C p.Gly474Gly synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 14 1 NM_000108.5 ENSP00000205402.3 P09622-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00892
AC:
1357
AN:
152206
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00582
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00634
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00812
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00874
AC:
2196
AN:
251288
AF XY:
0.00875
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00602
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00665
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0115
AC:
16819
AN:
1461626
Hom.:
113
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0111
AC XY:
8105
AN XY:
727124
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00176
AC:
59
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00599
AC:
268
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00570
AC:
149
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000441
AC:
38
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0182
AC:
972
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000867
AC:
5
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0133
AC:
14786
AN:
1111826
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00898
AC:
542
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
842
1683
2525
3366
4208
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
570
1140
1710
2280
2850
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00890
AC:
1356
AN:
152324
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00883
AC XY:
658
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
101
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00582
AC:
89
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00634
AC:
22
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000621
AC:
3
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0183
AC:
194
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0133
AC:
906
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00803
AC:
17
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
66
131
197
262
328
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0117
Hom.:
14
Bravo
AF:
0.00787
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0116
EpiControl
AF:
0.0119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency Benign:4
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 08, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Dec 06, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DLD: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

not specified Benign:1
Dec 02, 2011
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
0.78
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=91/9
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34453495; hg19: chr7-107559502; API