rs34491822

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004560.4(ROR2):c.2285C>T(p.Ser762Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00381 in 1,613,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0038 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

ROR2
NM_004560.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.89

Variant links:

Genes affected

ROR2 (HGNC:10257): (receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a receptor protein tyrosine kinase and type I transmembrane protein that belongs to the ROR subfamily of cell surface receptors. The protein may be involved in the early formation of the chondrocytes and may be required for cartilage and growth plate development. Mutations in this gene can cause brachydactyly type B, a skeletal disorder characterized by hypoplasia/aplasia of distal phalanges and nails. In addition, mutations in this gene can cause the autosomal recessive form of Robinow syndrome, which is characterized by skeletal dysplasia with generalized limb bone shortening, segmental defects of the spine, brachydactyly, and a dysmorphic facial appearance. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ROR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0100109875).

BP6

Variant 9-91724209-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-91724209-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159817.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00347 (529/152296) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00573 (390/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00527. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 269 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ROR2	NM_004560.4 link	c.2285C>T	p.Ser762Leu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 9	ENST00000375708.4	NP_004551.2	Q01974

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ROR2	ENST00000375708.4 link	c.2285C>T	p.Ser762Leu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 9	1	NM_004560.4	ENSP00000364860.3	Q01974
ROR2	ENST00000375715.5 link	c.1865C>T	p.Ser622Leu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 13	1		ENSP00000364867.1	B1APY4
ROR2	ENST00000550066.5 link	n.2753C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 11 of 11	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00348

AC:

529

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000844

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00847

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00573

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00292

AC:

731

AN:

250500

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00287

AC XY:

389

AN XY:

135544

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000370

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000405

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00803

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00454

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00359

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00384

AC:

5616

AN:

1460940

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00376

AC XY:

2730

AN XY:

726860

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000492

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00777

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00448

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00283

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00347

AC:

529

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00361

AC XY:

269

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000842

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00847

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00573

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00284

Alfa

AF:

0.00398

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00224

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00297

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00311

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00407

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00327

AC:

397

EpiCase

AF:

0.00371

EpiControl

AF:

0.00338

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

ROR2: BS1, BS2 -

May 12, 2022

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Brachydactyly, type B1Robinow syndrome, autosomal recessive

Uncertain:1

Aug 28, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Brachydactyly type B1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.16

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.12

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.060

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.10

T;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.62

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.61

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.97

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.17

MetaRNN

Benign

0.010

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.039

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

.;L

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.65

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.6

D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.42

Sift

Benign

0.045

D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.35

T;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D

Vest4

0.69

MVP

0.93

MPC

0.54

ClinPred

0.033

GERP RS

4.7

Varity_R

0.22

gMVP

0.55

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over