rs34504623

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):​c.1908+15C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.105 in 1,540,732 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,916 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.079 ( 680 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.11 ( 9236 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.98

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
SDHA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Illumina, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • neurodegeneration with ataxia and late-onset optic atrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Leigh syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Leigh syndrome with leukodystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • mitochondrial complex II deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1GG
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.01).
BP6
Variant 5-254521-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-254521-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259245.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.117 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkc.1908+15C>T intron_variant Intron 14 of 14 ENST00000264932.11 NP_004159.2 P31040-1A0A024QZ30

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkc.1908+15C>T intron_variant Intron 14 of 14 1 NM_004168.4 ENSP00000264932.6 P31040-1
ENSG00000286001ENST00000651543.1 linkn.*641+15C>T intron_variant Intron 13 of 23 ENSP00000499215.1 A0A494C1T6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0791
AC:
11899
AN:
150508
Hom.:
680
Cov.:
28
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0706
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0692
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.103
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.114
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.119
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0822
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0783
AC:
12239
AN:
156268
AF XY:
0.0766
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0601
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0962
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.120
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.117
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0977
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.108
AC:
150186
AN:
1390108
Hom.:
9236
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.105
AC XY:
72411
AN XY:
686536
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0176
AC:
539
AN:
30578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0643
AC:
2310
AN:
35940
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.100
AC:
2483
AN:
24806
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000139
AC:
5
AN:
36090
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0167
AC:
1326
AN:
79202
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.127
AC:
6206
AN:
48882
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0344
AC:
138
AN:
4014
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.122
AC:
131466
AN:
1073430
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0999
AC:
5713
AN:
57166
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6107
12215
18322
24430
30537
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4702
9404
14106
18808
23510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0790
AC:
11895
AN:
150624
Hom.:
680
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.0762
AC XY:
5605
AN XY:
73572
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
861
AN:
40414
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0691
AC:
1050
AN:
15198
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.103
AC:
357
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
8
AN:
5102
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0157
AC:
75
AN:
4772
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.114
AC:
1205
AN:
10542
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0342
AC:
10
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.119
AC:
8095
AN:
67842
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0813
AC:
170
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
505
1010
1514
2019
2524
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
128
256
384
512
640
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0938
Hom.:
125
Bravo
AF:
0.0746

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Oct 31, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
May 14, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-1.0
CADD
Benign
0.086
DANN
Benign
0.34
PhyloP100
-2.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34504623; hg19: chr5-254636; COSMIC: COSV53767694; COSMIC: COSV53767694; API