rs34527521

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.6660T>G(p.Gly2220Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00112 in 1,544,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00096 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.79

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

CHD7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).

BP6

Variant 8-60853385-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60853385-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 95806.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-60853385-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr8-60853385-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.79 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00096 (146/152110) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00196 (133/67982). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00169. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 53 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 146 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	NM_017780.4 link	c.6660T>G	p.Gly2220Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 31 of 38	ENST00000423902.7	NP_060250.2	Q9P2D1-1Q6ZWF9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	ENST00000423902.7 link	c.6660T>G	p.Gly2220Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 31 of 38	5	NM_017780.4	ENSP00000392028.1	Q9P2D1-1
CHD7	ENST00000524602.5 link	c.1717-8844T>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 4	1		ENSP00000437061.1	Q9P2D1-4
CHD7	ENST00000695853.1 link	n.6660T>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 31 of 37			ENSP00000512218.1	A0A8Q3WKT9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000961

AC:

146

AN:

151992

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000284

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00107

AC:

205

AN:

191666

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00103

AC XY:

105

AN XY:

102372

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000678

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000836

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00199

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000229

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00114

AC:

1584

AN:

1392450

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00106

AC XY:

725

AN XY:

686002

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000292

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000908

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000612

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00139

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000612

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000960

AC:

146

AN:

152110

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000713

AC XY:

AN XY:

74362

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000284

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00112

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000827

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 20, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 06, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 23, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Gly2220Gly in exon 31 of CHD7: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.20% (127/63678) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs34527521). -

not provided

Benign:4

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CHD7: BP4, BP7 -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CHARGE syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

May 23, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

CHARGE syndrome;C3552553:Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia

Benign:1

Oct 25, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 5 with or without anosmia

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.88

CADD

Benign

0.26

DANN

Benign

0.42

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over