rs34624018
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000271.5(NPC1):c.3717C>T(p.His1239His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000313 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000271.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Niemann-Pick disease, type C1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Myriad Women’s Health
- Niemann-Pick disease type C, adult neurologic onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Niemann-Pick disease type C, juvenile neurologic onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Niemann-Pick disease type C, late infantile neurologic onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Niemann-Pick disease type C, severe early infantile neurologic onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Niemann-Pick disease type C, severe perinatal formInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPC1 | NM_000271.5 | c.3717C>T | p.His1239His | synonymous_variant | Exon 24 of 25 | ENST00000269228.10 | NP_000262.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000553 AC: 139AN: 251446 AF XY: 0.000603 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000310 AC: 453AN: 1461762Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000367 AC XY: 267AN XY: 727188 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000341 AC: 52AN: 152298Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000336 AC XY: 25AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 Uncertain:2Benign:2
- -
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
- -
NPC1: BP4, BP7 -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
NPC1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at