rs34813638

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):​c.1518C>T​(p.Arg506Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0018 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 28 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

CACNB2
NM_201596.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.365
Variant links:
Genes affected
CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 10-18539259-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18539259-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136646.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-18539259-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-18539259-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.365 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00992 (1510/152142) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0351 (1455/41500). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0336. There are 28 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 696 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1510 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CACNB2NM_201596.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1518C>T p.Arg506Arg synonymous_variant 14/14 ENST00000324631.13 NP_963890.2 Q08289-1
CACNB2NM_201590.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1356C>T p.Arg452Arg synonymous_variant 13/13 ENST00000377329.10 NP_963884.2 Q08289-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CACNB2ENST00000324631.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.1518C>T p.Arg506Arg synonymous_variant 14/141 NM_201596.3 ENSP00000320025.8 Q08289-1
CACNB2ENST00000377329.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1356C>T p.Arg452Arg synonymous_variant 13/131 NM_201590.3 ENSP00000366546.4 Q08289-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00991
AC:
1506
AN:
152024
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00247
AC:
622
AN:
251344
Hom.:
9
AF XY:
0.00169
AC XY:
229
AN XY:
135850
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0349
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000528
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000949
AC:
1388
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000806
AC XY:
586
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0350
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00163
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000261
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00169
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00992
AC:
1510
AN:
152142
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00936
AC XY:
696
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.00578
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.0102
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 08, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 13, 2016- -
Brugada syndrome 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtJul 28, 2017- -
CACNB2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 03, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 15, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.15
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34813638; hg19: chr10-18828188; API