rs34813638
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):c.1518C>T(p.Arg506Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0018 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 28 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 19 hom. )
Consequence
CACNB2
NM_201596.3 synonymous
NM_201596.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.365
Genes affected
CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 10-18539259-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18539259-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136646.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-18539259-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-18539259-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.365 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00992 (1510/152142) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0351 (1455/41500). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0336. There are 28 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 696 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1510 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNB2 | NM_201596.3 | c.1518C>T | p.Arg506Arg | synonymous_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000324631.13 | NP_963890.2 | |
CACNB2 | NM_201590.3 | c.1356C>T | p.Arg452Arg | synonymous_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000377329.10 | NP_963884.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNB2 | ENST00000324631.13 | c.1518C>T | p.Arg506Arg | synonymous_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_201596.3 | ENSP00000320025.8 | ||
CACNB2 | ENST00000377329.10 | c.1356C>T | p.Arg452Arg | synonymous_variant | 13/13 | 1 | NM_201590.3 | ENSP00000366546.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00991 AC: 1506AN: 152024Hom.: 28 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1506
AN:
152024
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00247 AC: 622AN: 251344Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00169 AC XY: 229AN XY: 135850
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
622
AN:
251344
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
229
AN XY:
135850
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000949 AC: 1388AN: 1461848Hom.: 19 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000806 AC XY: 586AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1388
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
586
AN XY:
727222
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00992 AC: 1510AN: 152142Hom.: 28 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00936 AC XY: 696AN XY: 74374
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1510
AN:
152142
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
696
AN XY:
74374
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 08, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 13, 2016 | - - |
Brugada syndrome 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jul 28, 2017 | - - |
CACNB2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 03, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 15, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at