rs34882957
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PS1_ModerateBP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001737.5(C9):c.499C>T(p.Pro167Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00769 in 1,612,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely pathogenicin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001737.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9 | NM_001737.5 | c.499C>T | p.Pro167Ser | missense_variant | 5/11 | ENST00000263408.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9 | ENST00000263408.5 | c.499C>T | p.Pro167Ser | missense_variant | 5/11 | 1 | NM_001737.5 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00595 AC: 905AN: 152136Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00519 AC: 1306AN: 251480Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00523 AC XY: 711AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00787 AC: 11499AN: 1460682Hom.: 62 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00767 AC XY: 5573AN XY: 726718
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00594 AC: 905AN: 152254Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00551 AC XY: 410AN XY: 74446
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2023 | C9: BS2; ENSG00000289699: BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Age related macular degeneration 15 Other:1
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Nov 01, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at