rs34897053
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_031220.4(PITPNM3):c.477C>T(p.Ser159Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0327 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,644 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.030 ( 142 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.033 ( 1502 hom. )
Consequence
PITPNM3
NM_031220.4 synonymous
NM_031220.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.51
Genes affected
PITPNM3 (HGNC:21043): (PITPNM family member 3) This gene encodes a member of a family of membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol transfer domain-containing proteins. The calcium-binding protein has phosphatidylinositol (PI) transfer activity and interacts with the protein tyrosine kinase PTK2B (also known as PYK2). The protein is homologous to a Drosophila protein that is implicated in the visual transduction pathway in flies. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal dominant cone dystrophy. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 17-6483627-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-6483627-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 261948.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-6483627-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.51 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.123 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PITPNM3 | NM_031220.4 | c.477C>T | p.Ser159Ser | synonymous_variant | 6/20 | ENST00000262483.13 | NP_112497.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PITPNM3 | ENST00000262483.13 | c.477C>T | p.Ser159Ser | synonymous_variant | 6/20 | 1 | NM_031220.4 | ENSP00000262483.8 | ||
PITPNM3 | ENST00000421306.7 | c.369C>T | p.Ser123Ser | synonymous_variant | 5/19 | 2 | ENSP00000407882.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0301 AC: 4583AN: 152058Hom.: 140 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4583
AN:
152058
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0499 AC: 12539AN: 251264Hom.: 594 AF XY: 0.0519 AC XY: 7056AN XY: 135870
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
12539
AN:
251264
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
7056
AN XY:
135870
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0330 AC: 48215AN: 1461886Hom.: 1502 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0354 AC XY: 25745AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
48215
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
25745
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0301 AC: 4586AN: 152176Hom.: 142 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0325 AC XY: 2415AN XY: 74416
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4586
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
2415
AN XY:
74416
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
382
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 16, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Cone-rod dystrophy 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at