rs34961653

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_152564.5(VPS13B):c.3243A>G(p.Pro1081Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000655 in 1,613,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

VPS13B
NM_152564.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0410

Variant links:

Genes affected

VPS13B (HGNC:2183): (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) This gene encodes a potential transmembrane protein that may function in vesicle-mediated transport and sorting of proteins within the cell. This protein may play a role in the development and the function of the eye, hematological system, and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Cohen syndrome. Multiple splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

VPS13B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).

BP6

Variant 8-99442433-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-99442433-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 361055.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.041 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00351 (534/152274) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0123 (511/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0114. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 231 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
VPS13B	NM_017890.5 link	c.3243A>G	p.Pro1081Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 62	ENST00000358544.7	NP_060360.3	Q7Z7G8-1
VPS13B	NM_152564.5 link	c.3243A>G	p.Pro1081Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 62	ENST00000357162.7	NP_689777.3	Q7Z7G8-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
VPS13B	ENST00000358544.7 link	c.3243A>G	p.Pro1081Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 62	1	NM_017890.5	ENSP00000351346.2		Q7Z7G8-1
VPS13B	ENST00000357162.7 link	c.3243A>G	p.Pro1081Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 62	1	NM_152564.5	ENSP00000349685.2		Q7Z7G8-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00352

AC:

535

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0124

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000947

AC:

238

AN:

251288

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000677

AC XY:

AN XY:

135804

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000463

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000358

AC:

523

AN:

1461660

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000319

AC XY:

232

AN XY:

727128

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0131

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000537

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000845

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00351

AC:

534

AN:

152274

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00310

AC XY:

231

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0123

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.00179

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00389

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

VPS13B: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Oct 22, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

May 01, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cohen syndrome

Benign:3

Oct 22, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

May 25, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.48

CADD

Benign

6.9

DANN

Benign

0.76

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over