rs35002004
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001110219.3(GJB6):c.489G>A(p.Leu163Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0033 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0033 ( 14 hom. )
Consequence
GJB6
NM_001110219.3 synonymous
NM_001110219.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.18
Genes affected
GJB6 (HGNC:4288): (gap junction protein beta 6) Gap junctions allow the transport of ions and metabolites between the cytoplasm of adjacent cells. They are formed by two hemichannels, made up of six connexin proteins assembled in groups. Each connexin protein has four transmembrane segments, two extracellular loops, a cytoplasmic loop formed between the two inner transmembrane segments, and the N- and C-terminus both being in the cytoplasm. The specificity of the gap junction is determined by which connexin proteins comprise the hemichannel. In the past, connexin protein names were based on their molecular weight, however the new nomenclature uses sequential numbers based on which form (alpha or beta) of the gap junction is present. This gene encodes one of the connexin proteins. Mutations in this gene have been found in some forms of deafness and in some families with hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 13-20222992-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20222992-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 45503.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr13-20222992-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-20222992-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00303 (461/152284) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00595 (91/15290). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00496. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 218 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR,Digenic gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB6 | NM_001110219.3 | c.489G>A | p.Leu163Leu | synonymous_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000647029.1 | NP_001103689.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB6 | ENST00000647029.1 | c.489G>A | p.Leu163Leu | synonymous_variant | 5/5 | NM_001110219.3 | ENSP00000493834.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00302 AC: 460AN: 152166Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
460
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00324 AC: 814AN: 251480Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00318 AC XY: 432AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
814
AN:
251480
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
432
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00333 AC: 4867AN: 1461864Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00324 AC XY: 2355AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4867
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2355
AN XY:
727236
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00303 AC: 461AN: 152284Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00293 AC XY: 218AN XY: 74466
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
461
AN:
152284
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
218
AN XY:
74466
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | GJB6: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 18, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 16, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10610709) - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 17, 2013 | This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not a lter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.5% (43/8600) of European American chromosomes by th e NHLBI Exome sequencing project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs350 02004). - |
Hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia syndrome;C2673759:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A;C2675235:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1B;C2675237:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 20, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at